| |
Racism Rampant in Arizona:
Similarities of South
Africa (Apartheid)
and Arizona
(SB
1070)
PHOENIX
(Jon Garrido, The Jon Garrido Network
and encyclopedia) July 27, 2010
Apartheid (Afrikaners, South African White persons, separateness) was a
system of legal racial segregation enforced by the National Party government in
South Africa between 1948 and 1994, under which the rights of the majority Black
inhabitants of South Africa were taken away and minority rule by white persons
who were the only persons who could vote was decreed by the "Rule of Law."
Racial segregation in South Africa began in colonial times, but apartheid as an
official policy was introduced following the general election of 1948. New
legislation classified inhabitants into racial groups ("black" and "white"), and
residential areas were segregated, by means of forced removals. From 1958, black
persons were deprived of their citizenship. The government segregated education,
property ownership, medical care,
and other public services, and
provided black persons with services much less in quality to those of white
persons.
Apartheid sparked significant internal resistance and violence as well as a long
trade embargo against South Africa. A series of popular uprisings and protests
were met with the banning of opposition and imprisoning of anti-apartheid
leaders. As unrest spread and became more violent, state organizations responded
with increasing repression and state-sponsored violence.
Reforms to apartheid in the 1980s failed to quell the mounting opposition and in
1990, President Frederik Willem de Klerk began negotiations to end apartheid,
culminating in multi-racial democratic elections in 1994, which were won by the
African National Congress under Nelson Mandela. The vestiges of apartheid still
shape South African politics and society.
The goal
to completely dominate South Africa was accomplished using the Rule of Law to
drastically diminish Civil Rights, services of medical, education, business and
property rights provided to Black persons to force them to leave South Africa.
By manipulating the legislative process to gain control of the Rule of Law to
author laws to benefit white persons at the expense of Black persons, the White
persons South African Afrikaners were for a considerable time ruthless toward
Black persons in South Africa creating severe consequences for opposing the
diminishing of their human rights. The Rule of Law
served as a tool for the government
of South Africa to suppress in a legalistic fashion
to achieve its goal to force Black persons to leave South Africa.
Today the same process used in South Africa is being used in
Arizona as the strategy to diminish the number of future Hispanic voters to
leave Arizona.
In Arizona, to maintain white control of elective
offices by forcing the ever increasing numbers of Hispanics to leave Arizona
by diminishing the number of Hispanic voters made possible from citizenship and
by removing future voters born in Arizona gaining citizenship as provided by the
U.S. Constitution, 14th
Amendment, Section 1, is under attack by Arizona white conservatives and Arizona
neo-Nazi fanatics who believe in white supremacy.
This is violation of Civil Rights of all Hispanics living in Arizona. There are
several lawsuits arguing the constitutionality of SB1070 but not one addresses
the violation of Civil Rights voting.
Voting is what gives America its foundation. One person, one vote is guaranteed
by the U.S. Constitution and all efforts to curb voting is a violation of Civil
Rights.
The Voting
Rights Act
of 1965
The 1965 Enactment
By
1965,
concerted
efforts to
break the
grip of
state
disfranchisement
had been
under way
for some
time, but
had achieved
only modest
success
overall and
in some
areas had
proved
almost
entirely
ineffectual.
The murder
of
voting-rights
activists in
Philadelphia,
Mississippi,
gained
national
attention,
along with
numerous
other acts
of violence
and
terrorism.
Finally, the
unprovoked
attack on
March 7,
1965, by
state
troopers on
peaceful
marchers
crossing the
Edmund
Pettus
Bridge in
Selma,
Alabama, en
route to the
state
capitol in
Montgomery,
persuaded
the
President
and Congress
to overcome
Southern
legislators'
resistance
to effective
voting
rights
legislation.
President
Johnson
issued a
call for a
strong
voting
rights law
and hearings
began soon
thereafter
on the bill
that would
become the
Voting
Rights Act.
Congress
determined
the existing
federal
anti-discrimination
laws were
not
sufficient
to overcome
the
resistance
by state
officials to
enforcement
of the 15th
Amendment.
The
legislative
hearings
showed the
Department
of Justice's
efforts to
eliminate
discriminatory
election
practices by
litigation
on a
case-by-case
basis had
been
unsuccessful
in opening
up the
registration
process; as
soon as one
discriminatory
practice or
procedure
was proven
to be
unconstitutional
and
enjoined, a
new one
would be
substituted
in its place
and
litigation
would have
to commence
anew.
President
Johnson
signed the
resulting
legislation
into law on
August 6,
1965.
Section 2 of
the Act,
which
closely
followed the
language of
the 15th
amendment,
applied a
nationwide
prohibition
against the
denial or
abridgment
of the right
to vote on
the literacy
tests on a
nationwide
basis. Among
its other
provisions,
the Act
contained
special
enforcement
provisions
targeted at
those areas
of the
country
where
Congress
believed the
potential
for
discrimination
to be the
greatest.
Under
Section 5,
jurisdictions
covered by
these
special
provisions
could not
implement
any change
affecting
voting until
the Attorney
General or
the United
States
District
Court for
the District
of Columbia
determined
the change
did not have
a
discriminatory
purpose and
would not
have a
discriminatory
effect. In
addition,
the Attorney
General
could
designate a
county
covered by
these
special
provisions
for the
appointment
of a federal
examiner to
review the
qualifications
of persons
who wanted
to register
to vote.
Further, in
those
counties
where a
federal
examiner was
serving, the
Attorney
General
could
request that
federal
observers
monitor
activities
within the
county's
polling
place.
The Voting
Rights Act
had not
included a
provision
prohibiting
poll taxes,
but had
directed the
Attorney
General to
challenge
its use. In
Harper
v.
Virginia
State Board
of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966), the Supreme Court held Virginia's poll
tax to be
unconstitutional
under the
14th
Amendment.
Between 1965
and 1969 the
Supreme
Court also
issued
several key
decisions
upholding
the
constitutionality
of Section 5
and
affirming
the broad
range of
voting
practices
that
required
Section 5
review. As
the Supreme
Court put it
in its 1966
decision
upholding
the
constitutionality
of the Act:
Congress had
found that
case-by-case
litigation
was
inadequate
to combat
wide-spread
and
persistent
discrimination
in voting,
because of
the
inordinate
amount of
time and
energy
required to
overcome the
obstructionist
tactics
invariably
encountered
in these
lawsuits.
After
enduring
nearly a
century of
systematic
resistance
to the
Fifteenth
Amendment,
Congress
might well
decide to
shift the
advantage of
time and
inertia from
the
perpetrators
of the evil
to its
victims.
The 1970 and 1975 Amendments
Congress
extended
Section 5
for five
years in
1970 and for
seven years
in 1975.
With these
extensions
Congress
validated
the Supreme
Court's
broad
interpretation
of the scope
of Section
5. During
the hearings
on these
extensions
Congress
heard
extensive
testimony
concerning
the ways in
which voting
electorates
were
manipulated
through
gerrymandering,
annexations,
adoption of
at-large
elections,
and other
structural
changes to
prevent
newly-registered
black voters
from
effectively
using the
ballot.
Congress
also heard
extensive
testimony
about voting
discrimination
that had
been
suffered by
Hispanic,
Asian and
Native
American
citizens,
and the 1975
amendments
added
protections
from voting
discrimination
for language
minority
citizens.
In
1973, the
Supreme
Court held
certain
legislative
multi-member
districts
unconstitutional
under the
14th
Amendment on
the ground
that they
systematically
diluted the
voting
strength of
minority
citizens in
Bexar
County,
Texas. This
decision in
White
v.
Regester,
412 U.S. 755
(1973),
strongly
shaped
litigation
through the
1970s
against
at-large
systems and
gerrymandered
redistricting
plans. In
Mobile
v.
Bolden,
446 U.S. 55
(1980),
however, the
Supreme
Court
required any
constitutional
claim of
minority
vote
dilution
must include
proof of a
racially
discriminatory
purpose, a
requirement
widely seen
as making
such claims
far more
difficult to
prove.
The 1982 Amendments
Congress
renewed in
1982 the
special
provisions
of the Act,
triggered by
coverage
under
Section 4
for
twenty-five
years.
Congress
also adopted
a new
standard,
which went
into effect
in 1985,
providing
how
jurisdictions
could
terminate
(or "bail
out" from)
coverage
under the
provisions
of Section
4.
Furthermore,
after
extensive
hearings,
Congress
amended
Section 2 to
provide a
plaintiff
could
establish a
violation of
the Section
without
having to
prove
discriminatory
purpose.
Reynolds
v.
Sims,
377
U.S.
533
(1964)
was
a
United
States
Supreme
Court
case
that
ruled
state
legislature
districts
had
to
be
roughly
equal
in
population.
The
eight
justices
who
struck
down
state
senate
inequality
based
their
decision
on
the
principle
of
"one
person,
one
vote".
In
his
majority
decision,
Chief
Justice
Earl
Warren
said
"Legislators
represent
people,
not
trees
or
acres.
Legislators
are
elected
by
voters,
not
farms
or
cities
or
economic
interests."
Similarities of South
Africa (Apartheid)
and Arizona
(SB
1070)
South Africa under Apartheid
Apartheid (Afrikaans, separateness) was a system of legal racial segregation
enforced by the National Party government in South Africa between 1948 and 1994,
under which the rights of the majority non-white inhabitants of South Africa
were taken away and minority rule by white persons who were the only persons
could vote was decreed by the "Rule of Law."
Racial segregation in South Africa began in colonial times, but apartheid as an
official policy was introduced following the general election of 1948. New
legislation classified inhabitants into racial groups ("black" and "white"), and
residential areas were segregated, by means of forced removals. From 1958, black
persons were deprived of their citizenship, legally becoming citizens of one of
ten tribally based self-governing homelands called bantustans, four of which
became nominally independent states. The government segregated education,
medical care, and other public services, and provided black persons with
services much less in quality to those of white persons.
Apartheid sparked significant internal resistance and violence as well as a long
trade embargo against South Africa. A series of popular uprisings and protests
were met with the banning of opposition and imprisoning of anti-apartheid
leaders. As unrest spread and became more violent, state organizations responded
with increasing repression and state-sponsored violence.
Reforms to apartheid in the 1980s failed to quell the mounting opposition and in
1990, President Frederik Willem de Klerk began negotiations to end apartheid,
culminating in multi-racial democratic elections in 1994, which were won by the
African National Congress under Nelson Mandela. The vestiges of apartheid still
shape South African politics and society.
Precursors of apartheid
The British colonial rulers introduced a system of Pass Laws in the Cape Colony
and Colony of Natal during the 19th century. This stemmed from the regulation of
black persons' movement from the tribal regions to those occupied by white
persons, ruled by the British. Laws were passed not only to restrict the
movement of black persons into these areas, but also to prohibit their movement
from one district to another without a signed pass. Black persons were not
allowed onto the streets of towns in the Cape Colony and Natal after dark and
had to carry their papers at all times.
The Franchise and Ballot Act of 1892 instituted limits based on financial means
and education to the black franchise and the Natal Legislative Assembly Bill of
1894 deprived Indians of the right to vote. In 1905 the General Pass Regulations
Bill denied blacks the vote altogether, limited them to fixed areas and
inaugurated the infamous Pass System. Then followed the Asiatic Registration Act
of 1906 required all Indians to register and carry passes, the South Africa Act
of 1910 that enfranchised whites, gave them complete political control over all
other race groups and removing the right of blacks to sit in parliament, the
Native Land Act of 1913 prevented all blacks, except those in the Cape, from
buying land outside "reserves," the Natives in Urban Areas Bill of 1918 forced
blacks into "locations", the Urban Areas Act of 1923 which introduced
residential segregation and provided cheap labor for industry led by white
persons, the Color Bar Act of 1926, prevented anyone black from practicing
skilled trades, the Native Administration Act of 1927 made the British Crown,
rather than paramount chiefs, the supreme head over all African affairs, the
Native Land and Trust Act of 1936) complemented the 1913 Native Land Act and, in
the same year, the Representation of Natives Act, which removed previous black
voters from the Cape voters' roll. One of the first pieces of segregating
legislation enacted by the Jan Smuts' United Party government was the Asiatic
Land Tenure Bill of 1946, which banned any further land sales to Indians.
Jan Smuts' United Party government began to move away from the rigid enforcement
of segregationist laws during World War II. Amid fears integration would
eventually lead the nation to racial assimilation, the legislature established
the Sauer Commission to investigate the effects of the United Party's policies.
The commission concluded integration would bring about a "loss of personality"
for all racial groups.
The South African general election in 1948 began the Institution of Apartheid
In the
run-up to
the 1948
elections,
the main
Afrikaner
nationalist
party, the
Herenigde
Nasionale
Party
(Reunited
National
Party) under
the
leadership
of
Protestant
cleric
Daniel
Francois
Malan,
campaigned
on its
policy of
apartheid.
The NP
narrowly
defeated
Smuts's
United Party
and formed a
coalition
government
with another
Afrikaner
nationalist
party, the
Afrikaner
Party. Malan
became the
first
apartheid
prime
minister,
and the two
parties
later merged
to form the
National
Party (NP).
National
Party
leaders
argued South
Africa did
not comprise
a single
nation, but
was made up
of four
distinct
racial
groups:
white and
black. These
groups were
split
further into
thirteen
"nations" or
racial
federations.
White
persons
encompassed
the English
and
Afrikaans
language
groups; the
black
populace was
divided into
ten such
groups.
The state
passed laws
which paved
the way for
"grand
apartheid",
which was
centered on
separating
races on a
large scale,
by
compelling
persons to
live in
separate
places
defined by
race. In
addition,
"petty
apartheid"
laws were
passed. The
principal
apartheid
laws were as
follows: The
first grand
apartheid
law was the
Population
Registration
Act of 1950,
which
formalized
racial
classification
and
introduced
an identity
card for all
persons over
the age of
eighteen,
specifying
their racial
group.
Official
teams or
Boards were
established
to come to
an ultimate
conclusion
on those
persons
whose race
was unclear.
This caused
difficulty,
especially
for black
persons,
separating
their
families as
members were
allocated
different
races.
The second
pillar of
grand
apartheid
was the
Group Areas
Act of 1950.
Until then,
most
settlements
had persons
of different
races living
side by
side. This
Act put an
end to
diverse
areas and
determined
where one
lived
according to
race. Each
race was
allotted its
own area,
which was
used in
later years
as a basis
of forced
removal.
Further
legislation
in 1951
allowed the
government
to demolish
black
shackland
slums and
forced white
employers to
pay for the
construction
of housing
for those
black
workers who
were
permitted to
reside in
cities
otherwise
reserved for
white
persons.
The
Prohibition
of Mixed
Marriages
Act of 1949
prohibited
marriage
between
persons of
different
races, and
the
Immorality
Act of 1950
made sexual
relations
with a
person of a
different
race a
criminal
offence.
Under the
Reservation
of Separate
Amenities
Act of 1953,
municipal
grounds
could be
reserved for
a particular
race,
creating,
among other
things,
separate
beaches,
buses,
hospitals,
schools and
universities.
Signboards
such as
"whites
only"
applied to
public
areas, even
including
park
benches.
Black
persons were
provided
with
services
greatly
inferior to
those of
whites. An
act of 1956
formalized
racial
discrimination
in
employment.
Further laws
had the aim
of
suppressing
resistance,
especially
armed
resistance,
to
apartheid.
The
Suppression
of Communism
Act of 1950
banned the
South
African
Communist
Party and
any other
political
party the
government
chose to
label as
'communist'.
Disorderly
gatherings
were banned,
as were
certain
organizations
that were
deemed
threatening
to the
government.
Education
was
segregated
by means of
the 1953
Bantu
Education
Act, which
crafted a
separate
system of
education
for African
students and
was designed
to prepare
black
persons for
lives as a
laboring
class. In
1959
separate
universities
were created
for black
persons.
Existing
universities
were not
permitted to
enroll new
black
students.
The
Afrikaans
Medium
Decree of
1974
required the
use of
Afrikaans
and English
on an equal
basis in
high schools
outside the
homelands.
The Bantu
Authorities
Act of 1951
created
separate
government
structures
for black
citizens and
was the
first piece
of
legislation
established
to support
the
government's
plan of
separate
development
in the
Bantustans.
The
Promotion of
Black
Self-Government
Act of 1958
entrenched
the National
Party's
policy of
nominally
independent
"homelands"
for black
persons.
So-called
"selfgoverning
Bantu units"
were
proposed,
which would
have
devolved
administrative
powers, with
the promise
later of
autonomy and
self-government.
The Bantu
Investment
Corporation
Act of 1959
set up a
mechanism to
transfer
capital to
the
homelands in
order to
create
employment
there.
Legislation
of 1967
allowed the
government
to stop
industrial
development
in "white"
cites and
redirect
such
development
to the
"homelands".
The Black
Homeland
Citizenship
Act of 1970
marked a new
phase in the
Bantustan
strategy. It
changed the
status of
black
persons
living in
South Africa
so that they
were no
longer
citizens of
South
Africa, but
became
citizens of
one of the
ten
autonomous
territories.
The aim was
to ensure a
demographic
majority of
white
persons
within South
Africa by
having all
ten
Bantustans
choose
"independence".
Interracial
contact in
sport was
frowned
upon, but
there were
no
segregationist
sports laws.
The
government
was able to
keep sport
segregated
using other
legislation,
such as the
Group Areas
Act.
The
government
tightened
existing
pass laws,
compelling
black South
Africans to
carry
identity
documents to
prevent the
migration of
blacks to
"white"
South
Africa. Any
black
residents of
cities had
to be in
employment.
Families
were
excluded,
thus
separating
wives from
husbands and
parents from
children. Up
until 1956,
women were
for the most
part
excluded
from these
pass
requirements
as attempts
to introduce
pass laws
for women
were met
with fierce
resistance.
Disenfranchisement
of black
voters
In 1950, D F
Malan
announced
the NP's
intention to
create a
Colored
Affairs
Department.
J.G.
Strijdom,
Malan's
successor as
Prime
Minister,
moved to
strip voting
rights from
black
residents of
the Cape
Province.
The previous
government
had first
introduced
the Separate
Representation
of Voters
Bill in
parliament
in 1951;
however, a
group of
four voters,
G Harris, WD
Franklin, WD
Collins and
Edgar Deane,
challenged
its validity
in court
with support
from the
United
Party. The
Cape Supreme
Court upheld
the act, but
the Appeal
Court
reversed on
appeal,
finding the
act invalid
because a
two-thirds
majority in
a joint
sitting of
both Houses
of
Parliament
was needed
in order to
change the
entrenched
clauses of
the
Constitution.
The
government
then
introduced
the High
Court of
Parliament
Bill of
1952, which
gave
parliament
the power to
overrule
decisions of
the court.
The Cape
Supreme
Court and
the Appeal
Court
declared
this invalid
too.
In 1955 the
Strijdom
government
increased
the number
of judges in
the Appeal
Court from
five to
eleven, and
appointed
pro-Nationalist
judges to
fill the new
places. In
the same
year they
introduced
the Senate
Act, which
increased
the senate
from 49
seats to 89.
Adjustments
were made
such that
the NP
controlled
77 of these
seats. The
parliament
met in a
joint
sitting and
passed the
Separate
Representation
of Voters
Act in 1956,
which
transferred
Black voters
from the
common
voters' roll
in the Cape
to a new
Black
voters'
roll.
Immediately
after the
vote, the
Senate was
restored to
its original
size. The
Senate Act
was
contested in
the Supreme
Court, but
the recently
enlarged
Appeal
Court,
packed with
government-supporting
judges,
rejected the
application
by the
Opposition
and upheld
the Senate
Act, and
also the Act
to remove
Black
voters.
Unity
among white
South
Africans
Before South
Africa
became a
republic,
politics
among white
South
Africans was
typified by
the division
between the
chiefly-Afrikaner
pro-republicans
and the
largely
English
anti-republicans,
with the
legacy of
the Boer War
still a
factor for
some
persons.
Once
republican
status was
attained,
Verwoerd
called for
improved
relations
and greater
accord
between
those of
British
descent and
the
Afrikaners.
He claimed
that the
only
difference
now was
between
those who
supported
apartheid
and those in
opposition
to it. The
ethnic
divide would
no longer be
between
Afrikaans
speakers and
English
speakers,
but rather
white and
black
ethnicities.
Most
Afrikaners
supported
the notion
of unanimity
of white
persons to
ensure their
safety.
White voters
of British
descent were
divided.
Many had
opposed a
republic,
for example
leading to a
majority
"no" vote in
Natal.
Later,
however,
some of them
recognized
the
perceived
need for
white unity,
convinced by
the growing
trend of
decolonization
elsewhere in
Africa,
which left
them
apprehensive.
Harold
Macmillan's
"Wind of
Change"
pronouncement
left the
British
faction
feeling that
Britain had
abandoned
them. The
more
conservative
English-speakers
gave support
to Verwoerd;
others were
troubled by
the severing
of ties with
Britain and
remained
loyal to the
Crown. They
were acutely
displeased
at the
choice
between
British and
South
African
nationality.
Although
Verwoerd
tried to
bond these
different
blocs, the
subsequent
ballot
illustrated
only a minor
swell of
support,
indicating
that a great
many English
speakers
remained
apathetic
and that
Verwoerd had
not
succeeded in
uniting the
white
population.
Homeland
system
Under the
homeland
system, the
South
African
government
attempted to
divide South
Africa into
a number of
separate
states, each
of which was
supposed to
develop into
a separate
nation-state
for a
different
ethnic
group.
Territorial
separation
was not a
new
institution.
There were,
for example,
the
"reserves"
created
under the
British
government
in the
nineteenth
century.
Under
apartheid,
some
thirteen per
cent of the
land was
reserved for
black
homelands, a
relatively
small amount
compared to
the total
population,
and
generally in
economically
unproductive
areas of the
country. The
Tomlinson
Commission
of 1954
justified
apartheid
and the
homeland
system, but
stated that
additional
land ought
to be given
to the
homelands, a
recommendation
which was
not carried
out.
With the
accession to
power of Dr
Hendrik
Frensch
Verwoerd in
1958, the
policy of
"separate
development"
came into
being, with
the homeland
structure as
one of its
cornerstones.
Verwoerd
came to
believe in
the granting
of
independence
to these
homelands.
The
government
justified
its plans on
the basis
the
government's
policy is,
therefore,
not a policy
of
discrimination
on the
grounds of
race or
color, but a
policy of
differentiation
on the
ground of
nationhood,
of different
nations,
granting to
each
self-determination
within the
borders of
their
homelands -
hence this
policy of
separate
development."
Under the
homelands
system,
blacks would
no longer be
citizens of
South
Africa; they
would
instead
become
citizens of
the
independent
homelands
who merely
worked in
South Africa
as foreign
migrant
laborers on
temporary
work
permits. In
1958, the
Promotion of
Black
Self-Government
Act was
passed, and
border
industries
and the
Bantu
Investment
Corporation
were
established
to promote
economic
development
and the
provision of
employment
in or near
the
homelands.
Many black
South
Africans who
had never
resided in
their
identified
homeland
were
nonetheless
forcibly
removed from
the cities
to the
homelands.
Once a
homeland was
granted its
nominal
independence,
its
designated
citizens had
their South
African
citizenship
revoked,
replaced
with
citizenship
in their
homeland.
These
persons were
then issued
passports
instead of
passbooks.
Citizens of
the
nominally
autonomous
homelands
also had
their South
African
citizenship
circumscribed,
meaning they
were no
longer
legally
considered
South
African. The
South
African
government
attempted to
draw an
equivalence
between
their view
of black
citizens of
the
homelands
and the
problems
which other
countries
faced
through
entry of
illegal
immigrants.
Forced
removals
During the
1960s, 1970s
and early
1980s, the
government
implemented
a policy of
'resettlement',
to force
persons to
move to
their
designated
"group
areas". Some
argue that
over three
and a half
million
persons were
forced to
resettle
during this
period.
These
removals
included
persons
re-located
due to slum
clearance
programs,
labor
tenants on
white-owned
farms, the
inhabitants
of the
so-called
'black
spots',
areas of
black-owned
land
surrounded
by white
farms, the
families of
workers
living in
townships
close to the
homelands,
and 'surplus
persons'
from urban
areas,
including
thousands of
persons from
the Western
Cape (which
was declared
a 'Colored
Labor
Preference
Area') who
were moved
to the
Transkei and
Ciskei
homelands.
The
best-publicized
forced
removals of
the 1950s
occurred in
Johannesburg,
when 60,000
persons were
moved to the
new township
of Soweto,
an
abbreviation
for South
Western
Townships.
Until 1955,
Sophiatown
had been one
of the few
urban areas
where blacks
were allowed
to own land,
and was
slowly
developing
into a
multiracial
slum. As
industry in
Johannesburg
grew,
Sophiatown
became the
home of a
rapidly
expanding
black
workforce,
as it was
convenient
and close to
town. It
could also
boast the
only
swimming
pool for
black
children in
Johannesburg.
As one of
the oldest
black
settlements
in
Johannesburg,
Sophiatown
held an
almost
symbolic
importance
for the
50,000
blacks it
contained,
both in
terms of its
sheer
vibrancy and
its unique
culture.
Despite a
vigorous ANC
protest
campaign and
worldwide
publicity,
the removal
of
Sophiatown
began on 9
February
1955 under
the Western
Areas
Removal
Scheme. In
the early
hours,
heavily
armed police
entered
Sophiatown
to force
residents
out of their
homes and
load their
belongings
onto
government
trucks. The
residents
were taken
to a large
tract of
land,
thirteen
miles (19
km) from the
city centre,
known as
Meadowlands
(that the
government
had
purchased in
1953).
Meadowlands
became part
of a new
planned
black city
called
Soweto. The
Sophiatown
slum was
destroyed by
bulldozers,
and a new
white suburb
named
Triumph was
built in its
place. This
pattern of
forced
removal and
destruction
was to
repeat
itself over
the next few
years, and
was not
limited to
persons of
African
descent.
Forced
removals
from areas
like Cato
Manor (Mkhumbane)
in Durban,
and District
Six in Cape
Town, where
55,000 black
persons were
forced to
move to new
townships on
the Cape
Flats, were
carried out
under the
Group Areas
Act of 1950.
Ultimately,
nearly
600,000
black,
Indian and
Chinese
persons were
moved in
terms of the
Group Areas
Act. Some
40,000 white
persons were
also forced
to move when
land was
transferred
from "white
South
Africa" into
the black
homelands.
Petty
apartheid
The National
Party passed
a string of
legislation
which became
known as
petty
apartheid.
The first of
these was
the
Prohibition
of Mixed
Marriages
Act 55 of
1949,
prohibiting
marriage
between
white
persons and
persons of
other races.
The
Immorality
Amendment
Act 21 of
1950 (as
amended in
1957 by Act
23) forbade
"unlawful
racial
intercourse"
and "any
immoral or
indecent
act" between
a white
person and
an black
person.
Blacks were
not allowed
to run
businesses
or
professional
practices in
those areas
designated
as "white
South
Africa"
without a
permit. They
were
supposed to
move to the
black
"homelands"
and set up
businesses
and
practices
there.
Transport
and civil
facilities
were
segregated.
Black buses
stopped at
black bus
stops and
white buses
at white
ones.
Trains,
hospitals
and
ambulances
were
segregated.
Because of
the smaller
numbers of
white
patients and
the fact
that white
doctors
preferred to
work in
white
hospitals,
conditions
in white
hospitals
were much
better than
those in
often
overcrowded
black
hospitals.
Blacks were
excluded
from living
or working
in white
areas,
unless they
had a pass
nicknamed
the dompas
("dumb pass"
in
Afrikaans).
Only blacks
with
"Section 10"
rights
(those who
had migrated
to the
cities
before World
War II) were
excluded
from this
provision. A
pass was
issued only
to a black
person with
approved
work.
Spouses and
children had
to be left
behind in
black
homelands. A
pass was
issued for
one
magisterial
district
(usually one
town)
confining
the holder
to that area
only. Being
without a
valid pass
made a
person
subject to
arrest and
trial for
being an
illegal
migrant.
This was
often
followed by
deportation
to the
person's
homeland and
prosecution
of the
employer
(for
employing an
illegal
migrant).
Police vans
patrolled
the white
areas to
round up
illegal
blacks found
there
without
passes.
Black
persons were
not allowed
to employ
white
persons in
white South
Africa.
Although
trade unions
for black
and colored
(mixed race)
workers had
existed
since the
early 20th
century, it
was not
until the
1980s
reforms a
mass black
trade union
movement
developed.
In the 1970s
each black
child's
education
within the
Bantu
Education
system (the
education
system
practiced in
black
schools
within white
South
Africa) cost
the state
only a tenth
of each
white
child's.
Higher
education
was provided
in separate
universities
and colleges
after 1959.
Eight black
universities
were created
in the
homelands.
Fort Hare
University
in the
Ciskei (now
Eastern
Cape) was to
register
only
Xhosa-speaking
students.
Sotho,
Tswana, Pedi
and Venda
speakers
were placed
at the
newly-founded
University
College of
the North at
Turfloop,
while the
University
College of
Zululand was
launched to
serve Zulu
scholars.
Coloreds and
Indians were
to have
their own
establishments
in the Cape
and Natal
respectively.
In addition,
each black
homeland
controlled
its own
separate
education,
health and
police
system.
Blacks were
not allowed
to buy hard
liquor. They
were able
only to buy
state-produced
poor quality
beer. Public
beaches were
racially
segregated.
Public
swimming
pools, some
pedestrian
bridges,
drive-in
cinema
parking
spaces,
graveyards,
parks, and
public
toilets were
segregated.
Cinemas and
theatres in
white areas
were not
allowed to
admit
blacks.
There were
practically
no cinemas
in black
areas. Most
restaurants
and hotels
in white
areas were
not allowed
to admit
blacks
except as
staff. Black
Africans
were
prohibited
from
attending
white
churches
under the
Churches
Native Laws
Amendment
Act of 1957.
This was,
however,
never
rigidly
enforced,
and churches
were one of
the few
places races
could mix
without the
interference
of the law.
Blacks
earning 360
rand a year,
30 rand a
month, or
more had to
pay taxes
while the
white
threshold
was more
than twice
as high, at
750 rand a
year, 62.5
rand per
month. On
the other
hand, the
taxation
rate for
whites was
considerably
higher than
that for
blacks.
Blacks could
never
acquire land
in white
areas. In
the
homelands,
much of the
land
belonged to
a 'tribe',
where the
local
chieftain
would decide
how the land
had to be
utilized.
This
resulted in
white
persons
owning
almost all
the
industrial
and
agricultural
lands and
much of the
prized
residential
land. Most
blacks were
stripped of
their South
African
citizenship
when the
"homelands"
became
"independent".
Thus, they
were no
longer able
to apply for
South
African
passports.
Eligibility
requirements
for a
passport had
been
difficult
for blacks
to meet, the
government
contending
that a
passport was
a privilege,
not a right.
As such, the
government
did not
grant many
passports to
blacks.
Apartheid
pervaded
South
African
culture, as
well as the
law. This
was
reinforced
by much of
the media,
and the lack
of
opportunities
for the
races to mix
in a social
setting
entrenched
social
distance
between
persons.
Colored
classification
The
population
was
classified
into four
groups:
Black,
White,
Indian, and
Colored.
(These terms
are
capitalized
to denote
their legal
definitions
in South
African
law). The
Colored
group
included
persons of
mixed Bantu,
Khoisan, and
European
descent
(with some
Malay
ancestry,
especially
in the
Western
Cape). The
Apartheid
bureaucracy
devised
complex (and
often
arbitrary)
criteria at
the time
that the
Population
Registration
Act was
implemented
to determine
who was
Colored.
Minor
officials
would
administer
tests to
determine if
someone
should be
categorized
either
Colored or
Black, or if
another
person
should be
categorized
either
Colored or
White.
Different
members of
the same
family found
themselves
in different
race groups.
Further
tests
determined
membership
of the
various
sub-racial
groups of
the
Coloreds.
Many of
those who
formerly
belonged to
this racial
group are
opposed to
the
continuing
use of the
term
"colored" in
the
post-apartheid
era, though
the term no
longer
signifies
any legal
meaning. The
expressions
'so-called
Colored'
(Afrikaans
sogenaamde
Kleurlinge)
and 'brown
persons' (bruinmense)
acquired a
wide usage
in the
1980s.
Discriminated
against by
apartheid,
Coloreds
were as a
matter of
state policy
forced to
live in
separate
townships
in some
cases
leaving
homes their
families had
occupied for
generations
and
received an
inferior
education,
though
better than
that
provided to
Black South
Africans.
They played
an important
role in the
anti-apartheid
movement:
for example
the African
Political
Organization
established
in 1902 had
an
exclusively
colored
membership.
Voting
rights were
denied to
Coloreds in
the same way
that they
were denied
to blacks
from 1950 to
1983.
However, in
1977 the NP
caucus
approved
proposals to
bring
colored and
Indians into
central
government.
In 1982,
final
constitutional
proposals
produced a
referendum
among white
voters, and
the
Tricameral
Parliament
was
approved.
The
Constitution
was reformed
the
following
year to
allow the
Colored and
Asian
minorities
participation
in separate
Houses in a
Tricameral
Parliament,
and Botha
became the
first
Executive
State
President.
The theory
was that the
Colored
minority
could be
granted
voting
rights, but
the Black
majority
were to
become
citizens of
independent
homelands.
These
separate
arrangements
continued
until the
abolition of
apartheid.
The
Tricameral
reforms led
to the
formation of
the
(anti-apartheid)
UDF as a
vehicle to
try and
prevent the
co-option of
coloreds and
Indians into
an alliance
with white
South
Africans.
The
subsequent
battles
between the
UDF and the
NP
government
from 1983 to
1989 were to
become the
most intense
period of
struggle
between
left-wing
and
right-wing
South
Africans.
Women
under
apartheid
Colonialism
and
apartheid
had a major
impact on
women since
they
suffered
both racial
and gender
discrimination.
Oppression
against
African
women was
different
from
discrimination
against men.
They had
very few or
no legal
rights, no
access to
education
and no right
to own
property.
Jobs were
often hard
to find but
many African
women worked
as
agricultural
or domestic
workers
though wages
were
extremely
low, if
existent.
Children
suffered
from
diseases
caused by
malnutrition
and sanitary
problems,
and
mortality
rates were
therefore
high. The
controlled
movement of
African
workers
within the
country
through the
Natives
Urban Areas
Act of 1923
and the
pass-laws,
separated
family
members from
one another
as men
usually
worked in
urban
centers,
while women
were forced
to stay in
rural areas.
Marriage law
and births
were also
controlled
by the
government
and the
pro-apartheid
Dutch
Reformed
Church, who
tried to
restrict
African
birth rates.
Other
minorities
Defining its
East Asian
population,
a minority
in South
Africa who
do not
appear to
belong to
any of the
four
designated
groups, was
a constant
dilemma for
the
apartheid
government.
Chinese
South
Africans who
were
descendants
of migrant
workers who
came to work
in the gold
mines around
Johannesburg
in the late
19th
century,
were
classified
as "Other
Asian" and
hence
"non-white",
whereas
immigrants
from Japan
and Taiwan,
with which
South Africa
maintained
diplomatic
and economic
relations,
were
considered
"honorary
whites" with
the same
privileges
as normal
whites.
Conservatism
The National
Party
government
implemented,
alongside
apartheid, a
program of
social
conservatism.
Pornography,
gambling and
other such
vices were
banned.
Cinemas,
shops
selling
alcohol and
most other
businesses
were
forbidden
from
operating on
Sundays.
Abortion,
homosexuality
and sex
education
were also
restricted;
abortion was
legal only
in cases of
rape or if
the mother's
life was
threatened.
Television
was not
introduced
until 1976
because the
government
viewed it as
dangerous.
Television
was also run
on apartheid
lines - TV1
broadcast in
Afrikaans
and English
(geared to a
white
audience),
TV2 in Zulu
and Xhosa
and TV3 in
Sotho,
Tswana and
Pedi (both
geared to a
black
audience),
and TV4
mostly
showed
programs for
an
urban-black
audience.
Internal
resistance
to South
African
apartheid
The system
of apartheid
sparked
significant
internal
resistance.
The
government
responded to
a series of
popular
uprisings
and protests
with police
brutality,
which in
turn
increased
local
support for
the armed
resistance
struggle.
Internal
resistance
to the
apartheid
system in
South Africa
came from
several
sectors of
society and
saw the
creation of
organizations
dedicated
variously to
peaceful
protests,
passive
resistance
and armed
insurrection.
In 1949 the
youth wing
of the
African
National
Congress
(ANC) took
control of
the
organization
and started
advocating a
radical
black
nationalist
program. The
new young
leaders
proposed
that white
authority
could only
be
overthrown
through mass
campaigns.
In 1950 that
philosophy
saw the
launch of
the Program
of Action, a
series of
strikes,
boycotts and
civil
disobedience
actions that
led to
occasionally
violent
clashes with
the
authorities.
In 1959 a
group of
disenchanted
ANC members
formed the
Pan
Africanist
Congress
(PAC), which
organized a
demonstration
against pass
books on 21
March 1960.
One of those
protests was
held in the
township of
Sharpeville,
where 69
persons were
killed by
police in
the
Sharpeville
massacre.
In the wake
of the
Sharpeville
incident the
government
declared a
state of
emergency.
More than 18
000 persons
were
arrested,
including
leaders of
the ANC and
PAC, and
both
Organizations
were banned.
The
resistance
went
underground,
with some
leaders in
exile abroad
and others
engaged in
campaigns of
domestic
sabotage and
terrorism.
In May 1961,
prior to the
declaration
of South
Africa as a
Republic, an
assembly
representing
the banned
ANC called
for
negotiations
between the
members of
the
different
ethnic
groupings,
threatening
demonstrations
and strikes
during the
inauguration
of the
Republic if
their calls
were
ignored.
When the
government
overlooked
them, the
strikers
(among the
main
organizers
was a
42-year old,
Thembu-origin
Nelson
Mandela)
carried out
their
threats. The
government
countered
swiftly by
giving
police the
authority to
arrest
persons for
up to twelve
days and
detaining
many strike
leaders amid
numerous
cases of
police
brutality.
Defeated,
the
protesters
called off
their
strike. The
ANC then
chose to
launch an
armed
struggle
through a
newly formed
military
wing,
Umkhonto we
Sizwe (MK),
which would
perform acts
of sabotage
on tactical
state
structures.
Its first
sabotage
plans were
carried out
on 16
December
1961, the
anniversary
of the
Battle of
Blood River.
In the 1970s
the Black
Consciousness
Movement was
created by
tertiary
students
influenced
by the
American
Black Power
movement. BC
endorsed
black pride
and African
customs and
did much to
alter the
feelings of
inadequacy
instilled
among black
persons by
the
apartheid
system. The
leader of
the
movement,
Steve Biko,
was taken
into custody
on 18 August
1977 and was
murdered in
detention.
In 1976
secondary
students in
Soweto took
to the
streets in
the Soweto
uprising to
protest
against
forced
tuition in
Afrikaans.
On 16 June,
police
opened fire
on students
in what was
meant to be
a peaceful
protest.
According to
official
reports 23
persons were
killed, but
news
agencies put
the number
as high as
600 killed
and 4000
injured. In
the
following
years
several
student
Organizations
were formed
with the
goal of
protesting
against
apartheid,
and these
Organizations
were central
to urban
school
boycotts in
1980 and
1983 as well
as rural
boycotts in
1985 and
1986.
In parallel
to student
protests,
labor unions
started
protest
action in
1973 and
1974. After
1976 unions
and workers
are
considered
to have
played an
important
role in the
struggle
against
apartheid,
filling the
gap left by
the banning
of political
parties. In
1979 black
trade unions
were
legalized
and could
engage in
collective
bargaining,
although
strikes were
still
illegal.
At roughly
the same
time
churches and
church
groups also
emerged as
pivotal
points of
resistance.
Church
leaders were
not immune
to
prosecution,
and certain
faith-based
Organizations
were banned,
but the
clergy
generally
had more
freedom to
criticize
the
government
than
militant
groups did.
Although the
majority of
whites
supported
apartheid,
some 20
percent did
not.
Parliamentary
opposition
was
galvanized
by Helen
Suzman,
Colin Eglin
and Harry
Schwarz who
formed the
Progressive
Federal
Party.
Extra-parliamentary
resistance
was largely
centered in
the South
African
Communist
Party and
women's
Organization
the Black
Sash. Women
were also
notable in
their
involvement
in trade
union
Organizations
and banned
political
parties.
Commonwealth
South
Africa's
policies
were subject
to
international
scrutiny in
1960, when
British
Prime
Minister
Harold
Macmillan
criticized
them during
his
celebrated
Wind of
Change
speech in
Cape Town.
Weeks later,
tensions
came to a
head in the
Sharpeville
Massacre,
resulting in
more
international
condemnation.
Soon
thereafter,
Verwoerd
announced a
referendum
on whether
the country
should
become a
republic.
Verwoerd
lowered the
voting age
for whites
to eighteen
and included
whites in
South West
Africa on
the voter's
roll. The
referendum
on 5 October
that year
asked
whites, "Are
you in favor
of a
Republic for
the Union?",
and 52
percent
voted
"Yes".[69]
As a
consequence
of this
change of
status,
South Africa
needed to
reapply for
continued
membership
of the
Commonwealth,
with which
it had
privileged
trade links.
Even though
India became
a republic
within the
Commonwealth
in 1947 it
became clear
that African
and Asian
member
states would
oppose South
Africa due
to its
apartheid
policies. As
a result,
South Africa
withdrew
from the
Commonwealth
on 31 May
1961, the
day that the
Republic
came into
existence.
United
Nations
"We speak
out to put
the world on
guard
against what
is happening
in South
Africa. The
brutal
policy of
apartheid is
applied
before the
eyes of the
nations of
the world.
The persons
of Africa
are
compelled to
endure the
fact that on
the African
continent
the
superiority
of one race
over another
remains
official
policy, and
that in the
name of this
racial
superiority
murder is
committed
with
impunity.
Can the
United
Nations do
nothing to
stop this?"
UN Security
Council agreed on concerted action
against the apartheid regime,
demanding an end to racial
separation and discrimination
At the first
UN gathering
in 1946,
South Africa
was placed
on the
agenda. The
primary
subject in
question was
the handling
of South
African
Indians, a
great cause
of
divergence
between
South Africa
and India.
In 1952,
apartheid
was again
discussed in
the
aftermath of
the Defiance
Campaign,
and the UN
set up a
task team to
keep watch
on the
progress of
apartheid
and the
racial state
of affairs
in South
Africa.
Although
South
Africa's
racial
policies
were a cause
for concern,
most
countries in
the UN
concurred
this was a
domestic
affair,
which fell
outside the
UN's
jurisdiction.
In April
1960, the
UN's
conservative
stance on
apartheid
changed
following
the
Sharpeville
massacre,
and the
Security
Council for
the first
time agreed
on concerted
action
against the
apartheid
regime,
demanding an
end to
racial
separation
and
discrimination.
From 1960
the ANC
began a
campaign of
armed
struggle of
which there
would later
be a charge
of 193 acts
of terrorism
from
19611963,
mainly
bombings and
murders of
civilians.
Instead, the
South
African
government
then began
further
suppression,
banning the
ANC and PAC.
In 1961, UN
Secretary-General
Dag
Hammarskjφld
stopped over
in South
Africa and
subsequently
stated he
had been
unable to
reach
agreement
with Prime
Minister
Verwoerd.
On 6
November
1962, the
United
Nations
General
Assembly
passed
Resolution
1761,
condemning
South
African
apartheid
policies. In
1966, the UN
held the
first of
many
colloquiums
on
apartheid.
The General
Assembly
announced 21
March as the
International
Day for the
Elimination
of Racial
Discrimination,
in memory of
the
Sharpeville
massacre. In
1971, the
General
Assembly
formally
denounced
the
institution
of
homelands,
and a motion
was passed
in 1974 to
expel South
Africa from
the UN, but
this was
vetoed by
France,
Britain and
the United
States of
America, all
key trade
associates
of South
Africa.
On 7 August
1963 the
United
Nations
Security
Council
passed
Resolution
181 calling
for a
voluntary
arms embargo
against
South
Africa, and
in the same
year, a
Special
Committee
Against
Apartheid
was
established
to encourage
and oversee
plans of
action
against the
regime. From
1964, the US
and Britain
discontinued
their arms
trade with
South
Africa. It
also
condemned
the Soweto
massacre in
Resolution
392. In
1977, the
voluntary UN
arms embargo
became
mandatory
with the
passing of
United
Nations
Security
Council
Resolution
418.
Economic
sanctions
against
South Africa
were also
frequently
debated as
an effective
way of
putting
pressure on
the
apartheid
government.
In 1962, the
UN General
Assembly
requested
that its
members
sever
political,
fiscal and
transportation
ties with
South
Africa. In
1968, it
proposed
ending all
cultural,
educational
and sporting
connections
as well.
Economic
sanctions,
however,
were not
made
mandatory,
because of
opposition
from South
Africa's
main trading
partners.
In 1978 and
1983 the
United
Nations
condemned
South Africa
at the World
Conference
Against
Racism, and
a
significant
divestment
movement
started,
pressuring
investors to
disinvest
from South
African
companies or
companies
that did
business
with South
Africa.
After much
debate, by
the late
1980s the
United
States, the
United
Kingdom, and
23 other
nations had
passed laws
placing
various
trade
sanctions on
South
Africa. A
divestment
movement in
many
countries
was
similarly
widespread,
with
individual
cities and
provinces
around the
world
implementing
various laws
and local
regulations
forbidding
registered
corporations
under their
jurisdiction
from doing
business
with South
African
firms,
factories,
or banks.
Organization
for African
Unity
The
Organization
of African
Unity (OAU)
was created
in 1963. Its
primary
objectives
were to
eradicate
colonialism
and improve
social,
political
and economic
situations
in Africa.
It censured
apartheid
and demanded
sanctions
against
South
Africa.
African
states
agreed to
aid the
liberation
movements in
their fight
against
apartheid.
In 1969,
fourteen
nations from
Central and
East Africa
gathered in
Lusaka,
Zambia, and
formulated
the 'Lusaka
Manifesto',
which was
signed on 13
April by all
of the
countries in
attendance
except
Malawi. This
manifesto
was later
taken on by
both the OAU
and the
United
Nations.
The Lusaka
Manifesto
summarized
the
political
situations
of
self-governing
African
countries,
condemning
racism and
inequity,
and calling
for black
majority
rule in all
African
nations. It
did not
rebuff South
Africa
entirely,
though,
adopting an
appeasing
manner
towards the
apartheid
government,
and even
recognizing
its
autonomy.
Although
African
leaders
supported
the
emancipation
of black
South
Africans,
they
preferred
this to be
attained
through
peaceful
means.
South
Africa's
negative
response to
the Lusaka
Manifesto
and
rejection of
a change to
her policies
brought
about
another OAU
announcement
in October
1971. The
Mogadishu
Declaration
declared
that South
Africa's
rebuffing of
negotiations
meant that
her black
persons
could only
be freed
through
military
means, and
that no
African
state should
converse
with the
apartheid
government.
Henceforth,
it would be
up to South
Africa to
keep contact
with other
African
states.
Outward-looking
policy
In 1966, B.J.
Vorster was
made South
African
Prime
Minister. He
was not
prepared to
dismantle
apartheid,
but he did
try to
redress
South
Africa's
isolation
and to
revitalize
the
country's
global
reputation,
even those
with
black-ruled
nations in
Africa. This
he called
his
"Outward-Looking"
policy; the
buzzwords
for his
strategy
were
"dialogue"
and
"dιtente",
signifying a
reduction of
tension.
Vorster's
willingness
to talk to
African
leaders
stood in
contrast to
Verwoerd's
refusal to
engage with
leaders such
as Abubakar
Tafawa
Balewa of
Nigeria in
1962 and
Kenneth
Kaunda of
Zambia in
1964. In
1966,
Vorster met
with the
heads of the
neighboring
states of
Lesotho,
Swaziland
and
Botswana. In
1967,
Vorster
offered
technological
and
financial
aid to any
African
state
prepared to
receive it,
asserting
that no
political
strings were
attached,
aware that
many African
states
needed
financial
aid despite
their
opposition
to South
Africa's
racial
policies.
Many were
also tied to
South Africa
economically
because of
their
migrant
labor
population
working on
the South
African
mines.
Botswana,
Lesotho and
Swaziland
remained
outspoken
critics of
apartheid,
but depended
on South
Africa's
economic
aid.
Malawi was
the first
country not
on South
African
borders to
accept South
African aid.
In 1967, the
two states
set out
their
political
and economic
relations,
and, in
1969, Malawi
became the
only country
at the
assembly
which did
not sign the
Lusaka
Manifesto
condemning
South
Africa'
apartheid
policy. In
1970,
Malawian
president
Hastings
Banda made
his first
and most
successful
official
stopover in
South
Africa.
Associations
with
Mozambique
followed
suit and
were
sustained
after that
country won
its
sovereignty
in 1975.
Angola was
also granted
South
African
loans. Other
countries
which formed
relationships
with South
Africa were
Liberia,
Ivory Coast,
Madagascar,
Mauritius,
Gabon, Zaire
(now the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo),
Ghana and
the Central
African
Republic.
Although
these states
condemned
apartheid
(more than
ever after
South
Africa's
denunciation
of the
Lusaka
Manifesto),
South
Africa's
economic and
military
dominance
meant that
they
remained
dependent on
South Africa
to varying
degrees.
Cultural
and sporting
isolation
of South
Africa
South
Africa's
isolation in
sport began
in the mid
1950s and
increased
throughout
the 1960s.
Apartheid
forbade
multiracial
sport, which
meant that
overseas
teams, by
virtue of
their having
players of
diverse
races, could
not play in
South
Africa. In
1956, the
International
Table Tennis
Federation
severed its
ties with
the
all-white
South
African
Table Tennis
Union,
preferring
the
non-racial
South
African
Table Tennis
Board. The
apartheid
government
responded by
confiscating
the
passports of
the Board's
players so
that they
were unable
to attend
international
games.
In 1959, the
non-racial
South
African
Sports
Association
(SASA) was
formed to
secure the
rights of
all players
on the
global
field. After
meeting with
no success
in its
endeavors to
attain
credit by
collaborating
with white
establishments,
SASA
approached
the
International
Olympic
Committee
(IOC) in
1962,
calling for
South
Africa's
expulsion
from the
Olympic
Games. The
IOC sent
South Africa
a caution to
the effect
that, if
there were
no changes,
they would
be barred
from the
1964 Olympic
Games. The
changes were
initiated,
and in
January
1963, the
South
African
Non-Racial
Olympic
Committee (SANROC)
was set up.
The
Anti-Apartheid
Movement
persisted in
its campaign
for South
Africa's
exclusion,
and the IOC
acceded in
barring the
country from
the 1964
Games in
Tokyo. South
Africa
selected a
multi-racial
team for the
next Games,
and the IOC
opted for
incorporation
in the 1968
Games in
Mexico.
Because of
protests
from AAMs
and African
nations,
however, the
IOC was
forced to
retract the
invitation.
Foreign
complaints
about South
Africa's
bigoted
sports
brought more
isolation.
Racially
selected New
Zealand
sports teams
toured South
Africa,
until the
1970 New
Zealand All
Blacks rugby
tour allowed
Maori to go
under the
status of
'honorary
whites'.
Huge and
widespread
protest
occurred in
New Zealand
in 1981
against the
Springbok
tour, the
government
spent eight
million
dollars
protecting
games using
the army and
police
force. A
planned All
Black tour
to South
Africa in
1985
remobilized
the New
Zealand
protestors
and it was
cancelled. A
'rebel tour'
not
government
sanctioned
went ahead
in 1986, but
after that
sporting
ties were
cut, and New
Zealand made
a decision
not to
convey an
authorized
rugby team
to South
Africa until
the end of
apartheid.
B. J.
Vorster took
Verwoerd's
place as PM
in 1966 and
declared
that South
Africa would
no longer
dictate to
other
countries
what their
teams should
look like.
Although
this
reopened the
gate for
sporting
meets, it
did not
signal the
end of South
Africa's
racist
sporting
policies. In
1968,
Vorster went
against his
policy by
refusing to
permit Basil
D'Oliveira,
a Colored
South
African-born
cricketer,
to join the
English
cricket team
on its tour
to South
Africa.
Vorster said
that the
side had
been chosen
only to
prove a
point, and
not on
merit. After
protests,
however,
"Dolly" was
eventually
included in
the team.
Protests
against
certain
tours
brought
about the
cancellation
of a number
of other
visits, like
that of an
England
rugby team
in 1969/70.
In 1971,
Vorster
altered his
policies
even further
by
distinguishing
multiracial
from
multinational
sport.
Multiracial
sport,
between
teams with
players of
different
races,
remained
outlawed;
multinational
sport,
however, was
now
acceptable:
international
sides would
not be
subject to
South
Africa's
racial
stipulations.
In 1978,
Nigeria
boycotted
the
Commonwealth
Games
because New
Zealand's
sporting
contacts
with the
South
African
government
were not
considered
to be in
accordance
with the
1977
Gleneagles
Agreement.
Nigeria also
led the
32-nation
boycott of
the 1986
Commonwealth
Games
because of
British
prime
minister
Margaret
Thatcher's
ambivalent
attitude
towards
sporting
links with
South
Africa,
significantly
affecting
the quality
and
profitability
of the Games
and thus
thrusting
apartheid
into the
international
spotlight.[82]
Sporting
bans were
revoked in
1993, when
conciliations
for a
democratic
South Africa
were well
under way.
In the
1960s, the
Anti-Apartheid
Movements
began to
campaign for
cultural
boycotts of
apartheid
South
Africa.
Artists were
requested
not to
present or
let their
works be
hosted in
South
Africa. In
1963, 45
British
writers put
their
signatures
to an
affirmation
approving of
the boycott,
and, in
1964,
American
actor Marlon
Brando
called for a
similar
affirmation
for films.
In 1965, the
Writers'
Guild of
Great
Britain
called for a
proscription
on the
sending of
films to
South
Africa. Over
sixty
American
artists
signed a
statement
against
apartheid
and against
professional
links with
the state.
The
presentation
of some
South
African
plays in
Britain and
the United
States was
also vetoed.
After the
arrival of
television
in South
Africa in
1975, the
British
Actors
Union,
Equity,
boycotted
the service,
and no
British
program
concerning
its
associates
could be
sold to
South
Africa.
Sporting and
cultural
boycotts did
not have the
same impact
as economic
sanctions,
but they did
much to lift
consciousness
amongst
normal South
Africans of
the global
condemnation
of
apartheid.
Western
influence
While
international
opposition
to apartheid
grew, the
Nordic
countries in
particular
provided
both moral
and
financial
support for
the ANC. On
21 February
1986 a
week before
he was
murdered
Sweden's
prime
minister
Olof Palme
made the
keynote
address to
the Swedish
Persons'
Parliament
Against
Apartheid
held in
Stockholm.
In
addressing
the hundreds
of
anti-apartheid
sympathizers
as well as
leaders and
officials
from the ANC
and the
Anti-Apartheid
Movement
such as
Oliver
Tambo, Palme
declared:
"Apartheid
cannot be
reformed; it
has to be
eliminated."
Other
Western
countries
adopted a
more
ambivalent
position. In
the 1980s,
both the
Reagan and
Thatcher
administrations,
in the USA
and UK
respectively,
followed a
'constructive
engagement'
policy with
the
apartheid
government,
vetoing the
imposition
of UN
economic
sanctions on
South
Africa,
justified by
a belief in
free trade
and a vision
of South
Africa as a
bastion
against
Marxist
forces in
Southern
Africa.
Thatcher
declared the
ANC a
terrorist
Organization,
and in 1987
her
spokesman,
Bernard
Ingham,
famously
said that
anyone who
believed
that the ANC
would ever
form the
government
of South
Africa was
"living in
cloud cuckoo
land."
By the late
1980s,
however,
with the
tide of the
Cold War
turning and
no sign of a
political
resolution
in South
Africa,
Western
patience
with the
apartheid
government
began to run
out. By
1989, a
bipartisan
Republican/Democratic
initiative
in the US
favored
economic
sanctions
(realized as
the
Comprehensive
Anti-Apartheid
Act of
1986), the
release of
Nelson
Mandela and
a negotiated
settlement
involving
the ANC.
Thatcher too
began to
take a
similar
line, but
insisted on
the
suspension
of the ANC's
armed
struggle.
Britain's
significant
economic
involvement
in South
Africa may
have
provided
some
leverage
with the
South
African
government,
with both
the UK and
the US
applying
pressure on
the
government,
and pushing
for
negotiations.
However,
neither
Britain nor
the US were
willing to
apply
economic
pressure
upon their
multinational
interests in
South
Africa, such
as the
mining
company
Anglo
American.
Although a
high-profile
compensation
claim
against
these
companies
was thrown
out of court
in 2004, the
US Supreme
Court in May
2008 upheld
an appeal
court ruling
allowing
another
lawsuit that
seeks
damages of
more than
$400 billion
from major
international
companies
which are
accused of
aiding South
Africa's
apartheid
system.
South
African
Border War,
Angolan
civil war,
and Cuba in
Angola
By 1966,
SWAPO
launched
guerilla
raids from
neighboring
countries
against
South
Africa's
occupation
of
South-West
Africa
(present day
Namibia).
Initially
South Africa
fought a
counter-insurgency
war against
SWAPO. This
conflict
deepened
after Angola
gained its
independence
in 1975
under the
leadership
of the
leftist
Popular
Movement for
the
Liberation
of Angola (MPLA)
aided by
Cuba. South
Africa,
Zaire and
the United
States sided
with the
Angolan
rival UNITA
party
against the
MPLA's armed
force, FAPLA
(Persons's
Armed Forces
for the
Liberation
of Angola).
The
following
struggle
turned into
one of
several late
Cold War
flashpoints
in the
world. The
Angolan
civil war
developed
into a
conventional
war with
South Africa
and UNITA on
one side
against the
Angolan
government,
the Cubans
and SWAPO on
the other.
Total
onslaught
By 1980, as
international
opinion
turned
decisively
against the
apartheid
regime, the
government
and much of
the white
population
increasingly
looked upon
the country
as a bastion
besieged by
communism
and radical
black
nationalists.
Considerable
effort was
put into
circumventing
sanctions,
and the
government
even went so
far as to
develop
nuclear
weapons,
with the
help of
Israel. In
2010, The
Guardian
released
South
African
government
documents
that
revealed an
Israeli
offer to
sell
Apartheid
South Africa
nuclear
weapons.
Israel
categorically
denied these
allegations
and claimed
that the
documents
were minutes
from a
meeting
which did
not indicate
any concrete
offer for a
sale of
nuclear
weapons.
Shimon Peres
said that
The Guardian
article was
based on
"selective
interpretation...
and not on
concrete
facts."
The term
"front-line
states"
referred to
countries in
Southern
Africa
geographically
near South
Africa.
Although
these
front-line
states were
all opposed
to
apartheid,
many were
economically
dependent on
South
Africa. In
1980, they
formed the
Southern
African
Development
Coordination
Conference (SADCC),
the aim of
which was to
promote
economic
development
in the
region and
hence reduce
dependence
on South
Africa.
Furthermore,
many SADCC
members also
allowed the
exiled ANC
and Pan
Africanist
Congress
(PAC) to
establish
bases in
their
countries.
Cross-border
raids
South Africa
had a policy
of attacking
guerrilla-bases
and safe
houses of
the ANC, PAC
and SWAPO in
neighboring
countries
beginning in
the early
1980s. These
attacks were
in
retaliation
for acts of
terror such
as bomb
explosions,
massacres
and
guerrilla
actions
(like
sabotage) by
ANC, PAC and
SWAPO
guerrillas
in South
Africa and
Namibia. The
country also
aided
Organizations
in
surrounding
countries
who were
actively
combating
the spread
of communism
in southern
Africa. The
results of
these
policies
included:
Support
for
anti-government
guerrilla
groups such
as UNITA in
Angola and
RENAMO in
Mozambique
South
African
Defence
Force (SADF;
now the
South
African
National
Defence
Force; SANDF)
hit-squad
raids into
front-line
states.
Bombing
raids were
also
conducted
into
neighboring
states. Air
and commando
raids into
Zimbabwe,
Zambia and
Botswana
occurred the
same day,
against
selective
ANC targets.
An
assassination
attempt on
Zimbabwean
President
Robert
Mugabe on
December 18,
1981.
A full-scale
invasion of
Angola: this
was partly
in support
of UNITA,
but was also
an attempt
to strike at
SWAPO bases.
Bomb attacks
in Lesotho
Kidnapping
of refugees
and ANC
members in
Swaziland by
security
services.
An
unsuccessful
South
African
organized
coup in the
Seychelles
on November
25, 1981.
Targeting of
exiled ANC
leaders
abroad: Joe
Slovo's wife
Ruth First
was killed
by a parcel
bomb in
Maputo, and
'death
squads' of
the Civil
Cooperation
Bureau and
the
Directorate
of Military
Intelligence
attempted to
carry out
assassinations
on ANC
targets in
Brussels,
Paris,
Stockholm
and London.
In 1984,
Mozambican
president
Samora
Machel
signed the
Nkomati
Accord with
South
Africa's
president
P.W. Botha,
in an
attempt to
rebuild
Mozambique's
economy.
South Africa
agreed to
cease
supporting
anti-government
forces,
while the MK
was
prohibited
from
operating in
Mozambique.
This was a
setback for
the ANC. Two
years later,
President
Machel was
killed in an
air crash in
mountainous
terrain in
South Africa
near the
Mozambican
border after
returning
from a
meeting in
Zambia.
South Africa
was accused
by the
Mozambican
government
and U.S.
Secretary of
State George
P. Shultz of
continuing
its aid to
RENAMO and
having
caused the
accident by
using a
false radio
navigation
beacon to
lure the
aircraft
into
crashing.
This
conspiracy
theory was
never proven
and is still
a subject of
some
controversy,
despite the
South
African
Margo
Commission
finding that
the crash
was an
accident. A
Soviet
delegation
that did not
participate
in the
investigation
issued a
minority
report
implicating
South
Africa.
State
security
During the
1980s the
government,
led by P.W.
Botha,
became
increasingly
preoccupied
with
security. On
the advice
of American
political
scientist
Samuel P.
Huntington,
Botha's
government
set up a
powerful
state
security
apparatus to
"protect"
the state
against an
anticipated
upsurge in
political
violence
that the
reforms were
expected to
trigger. The
1980s became
a period of
considerable
political
unrest, with
the
government
becoming
increasingly
dominated by
Botha's
circle of
generals and
police
chiefs
(known as
securocrats),
who managed
the various
States of
Emergencies.
Botha's
years in
power were
marked also
by numerous
military
interventions
in the
states
bordering
South
Africa, as
well as an
extensive
military and
political
campaign to
eliminate
SWAPO in
Namibia.
Within South
Africa,
meanwhile,
vigorous
police
action and
strict
enforcement
of security
legislation
resulted in
hundreds of
arrests and
bans, and an
effective
end to the
ANC's
sabotage
campaign.
The
government
punished
political
offenders
brutally.
40,000
persons were
subjected to
whipping as
a form of
punishment
annually.
The vast
majority had
committed
political
offences and
were lashed
ten times
for their
trouble. If
convicted of
treason, a
person could
be hanged,
and the
government
executed
numerous
political
offenders in
this way.
As the 1980s
progressed,
more and
more
anti-apartheid
organizations
were formed
and
affiliated
with the UDF.
Led by the
Reverend
Allan Boesak
and
Albertina
Sisulu, the
UDF called
for the
government
to abandon
its reforms
and instead
abolish
apartheid
and
eliminate
the
homelands
completely.
State of
emergency
Serious
political
violence was
a prominent
feature of
South Africa
from 1985 to
1989, as
black
townships
became the
focus of the
struggle
between
anti-apartheid
Organizations
and the
Botha
government.
Throughout
the 1980s,
township
persons
resisted
apartheid by
acting
against the
local issues
that faced
their
particular
communities.
The focus of
much of this
resistance
was against
the local
authorities
and their
leaders, who
were seen to
be
supporting
the
government.
By 1985, it
had become
the ANC's
aim to make
black
townships
"ungovernable"
(a term
later
replaced by
"persons'
power") by
means of
rent
boycotts and
other
militant
action.
Numerous
township
councils
were
overthrown
or
collapsed,
to be
replaced by
unofficial
popular
Organizations,
often led by
militant
youth.
Persons'
courts were
set up, and
residents
accused of
being
government
agents were
dealt
extreme and
occasionally
lethal
punishment.
Black town
councillors
and
policemen,
and
sometimes
their
families,
were
attacked
with petrol
bombs,
beaten, and
murdered by
neck lacing,
where a
burning tyre
was placed
around the
victim's
neck.
On 20 July
1985, State
President
P.W. Botha
declared a
State of
Emergency in
36
magisterial
districts.
Areas
affected
were the
Eastern
Cape, and
the PWV
region
("Pretoria,
Witwatersrand,
Vereeniging").
Three months
later the
Western Cape
was included
as well. An
increasing
number of
Organizations
were banned
or listed
(restricted
in some
way); many
individuals
had
restrictions
such as
house arrest
imposed on
them. During
this state
of emergency
about 2,436
persons were
detained
under the
Internal
Security
Act. This
act gave
police and
the military
sweeping
powers. The
government
could
implement
curfews
controlling
the movement
of persons.
The
president
could rule
by decree
without
referring to
the
constitution
or to
parliament.
It became a
criminal
offence to
threaten
someone
verbally or
possess
documents
that the
government
perceived to
be
threatening.
It was
illegal to
advise
anyone to
stay away
from work or
oppose the
government.
It was
illegal,
too, to
disclose the
name of
anyone
arrested
under the
State of
Emergency
until the
government
saw fit to
release that
name.
Persons
could face
up to ten
years'
imprisonment
for these
offences.
Detention
without
trial became
a common
feature of
the
government's
reaction to
growing
civil unrest
and by 1988,
30,000
persons had
been
detained.
The media
was
censored,
thousands
were
arrested and
many were
interrogated
and
tortured.
On 12 June
1986, four
days before
the ten-year
anniversary
of the
Soweto
uprising,
the state of
emergency
was extended
to cover the
whole
country. The
government
amended the
Public
Security
Act,
expanding
its powers
to include
the right to
declare
"unrest"
areas,
allowing
extraordinary
measures to
crush
protests in
these areas.
Severe
censorship
of the press
became a
dominant
tactic in
the
government's
strategy and
television
cameras were
banned from
entering
such areas.
The state
broadcaster,
the South
African
Broadcasting
Corporation
(SABC)
provided
propaganda
in support
of the
government.
Media
opposition
to the
system
increased,
supported by
the growth
of a pro-ANC
underground
press within
South
Africa.
In 1987, the
State of
Emergency
was extended
for another
two years.
Meanwhile,
about
200,000
members of
the National
Union of
Mineworkers
commenced
the longest
strike
(three
weeks) in
South
African
history.
1988 saw the
banning of
the
activities
of the UDF
and other
anti-apartheid
Organizations.
Much of the
violence in
the late
1980s and
early 1990s
was directed
at the
government,
but a
substantial
amount was
between the
residents
themselves.
Many died in
violence
between
members of
Inkatha and
the UDF-ANC
faction. It
was later
proven that
the
government
manipulated
the
situation by
supporting
one side or
the other
when it
suited it.
Government
agents
assassinated
opponents
within South
Africa and
abroad; they
undertook
cross-border
army and
air-force
attacks on
suspected
ANC and PAC
bases. The
ANC and the
PAC in
return
exploded
bombs at
restaurants,
shopping
centres and
government
buildings
such as
magistrates
courts.
The state of
emergency
continued
until 1990,
when it was
lifted by
State
President
F.W. de
Klerk.
Final
years of
apartheid
In the 1960s
South Africa
had economic
growth
second only
to that of
Japan. Trade
with Western
countries
grew, and
investment
from the
United
States,
France and
Britain
poured in.
Resistance
among blacks
had been
crushed.
Since 1964
Mandela,
leader of
the African
Nation
Congress,
had been in
prison on
Robben
Island just
off the
coast from
Cape Town,
and it
appeared
that South
Africa's
security
forces could
handle any
resistance
to
apartheid.
In 1974,
resistance
to apartheid
was
encouraged
by
Portugal's
withdrawal
from
Mozambique
and Angola,
after the
1974
Carnation
Revolution.
South
African
troops
withdrew
from Angola
in early
1976,
failing to
prevent the
liberation
forces from
gaining
power there,
and black
students in
South Africa
celebrated a
victory of
black
liberation
over white
resistance.
The
Mahlabatini
Declaration
of Faith,
signed by
Mangosuthu
Buthelezi
and Harry
Schwarz in
1974,
enshrined
the
principles
of peaceful
transition
of power and
equality for
all. Its
purpose was
to provide a
blueprint
for the
government
of South
Africa by
consent and
racial peace
in a
multi-racial
society,
stressing
opportunity
for all,
consultation,
the federal
concept, and
a Bill of
Rights. It
caused a
split in the
United Party
that
ultimately
realigned
opposition
politics in
South
Africa, with
the
formation of
the
Progressive
Federal
Party in
1977. It was
the first of
such
agreements
by
acknowledged
black and
white
political
leaders in
South
Africa.
In 1978, the
defense
minister of
the
Nationalist
Party,
Pieter
Willem
Botha,
became Prime
Minister.
Botha's all
white regime
was worried
about the
Soviet Union
helping
revolutionaries
in South
Africa, and
the economy
had turned
sluggish.
The new
government
noted that
it was
spending too
much money
trying to
maintain the
segregated
homelands
that had
been created
for blacks
and the
homelands
were proving
to be
uneconomic.
Nor was
maintaining
blacks as a
third class
working
well. The
labor of
blacks
remained
vital to the
economy, and
illegal
black labor
unions were
flourishing.
Many blacks
remained too
poor to make
much of a
contribution
to the
economy
through
their
purchasing
power -
although
they were
more than 70
percent of
the
population.
Capitalism
functioned
on goodwill,
and it was
with
goodwill
that Botha's
regime was
most
concerned -
not for the
sake of
capitalism
so much as
it was
afraid that
an antidote
was needed
to prevent
the blacks
from being
attracted to
Communism.
The
anti-apartheid
movements in
the United
States and
Europe were
gaining
support for
boycotts
against
South
Africa, for
the
withdrawal
of U.S.
firms from
South Africa
and for the
release of
Mandela.
South Africa
was becoming
an outlaw in
the world
community of
nations.
Investing in
South Africa
by Americans
and others
was coming
to an end
and an
active
policy of
disinvestment
ensued. The
then ShellBP
used to
circumvent
the oil
embargo on
the
apartheid
regime by
buying crude
oil from
Nigeria and
transferring
the crude
oil from
their ship
to oil
tankers
headed for
apartheid
South
Africa. This
was done
outside
Nigeria's
territorial
waters. When
Nigeria
found out,
Shell BP was
nationalized.
In
retaliation,
Margaret
Thatcher's
government
introduced
visa
requirements
for
Nigerians
visiting
United
Kingdom.
This was in
retaliation
for Nigeria
refusing to
pay any
compensation
for the
nationalization.
Also many
South
Africans
attended
schools in
Nigeria.
Nelson
Mandela has
himself at
several
times
acknowledged
the role of
Nigeria in
the struggle
against
apartheid.
Tricameral
parliament
In the early
1980s,
Botha's
National
Party
government
started to
recognize
the
inevitability
of the need
to reform
apartheid.
Early
reforms were
driven by a
combination
of internal
violence,
international
condemnation,
changes
within the
National
Party's
constituency,
and changing
demographics
whites
constituted
only 16% of
the total
population,
in
comparison
to 20% fifty
years
earlier.
In 1983, a
new
constitution
was passed
implementing
a so-called
Tricameral
Parliament,
giving
coloreds and
Indians
voting
rights and
parliamentary
representation
in separate
houses - the
House of
Assembly
(178
members) for
whites, the
House of
Representatives
(85 members)
for coloreds
and the
House of
Delegates
(45 members)
for Indians.
Each House
handled laws
pertaining
to its
racial
group's "own
affairs",
including
health,
education
and other
community
issues. All
laws
relating to
"general
affairs"
(matters
such as
defense,
industry,
taxation and
Black
affairs)
were handled
by a cabinet
made up of
representatives
from all
three
houses,
where the
ruling party
in the white
House of
Assembly had
an
unassailable
numerical
advantage.
Blacks,
although
making up
the majority
of the
population,
were
excluded
from
representation;
they
remained
nominal
citizens of
their
homelands.
The first
Tricameral
elections
were largely
boycotted by
Colored and
Indian
voters, amid
widespread
rioting.
Reforms
and contact
with the ANC
under Botha
Concerned
over the
popularity
of Mandela,
Botha
denounced
him as an
arch-Marxist
committed to
violent
revolution,
but to
appease
black
opinion and
nurture
Mandela as a
benevolent
leader of
blacks the
government
moved
Mandela from
Robben
Island to a
prison in a
rural area
just outside
Cape Town,
Pollsmoor
prison,
where prison
life was
easier. And
the
government
allowed
Mandela more
visitors,
including
visits and
interviews
by
foreigners,
to let the
world know
that Mandela
was being
treated
well.
Black
homelands
were
declared
nation-states
and pass
laws were
abolished.
Also, black
labor unions
were
legitimized,
the
government
recognized
the right of
blacks to
live in
urban areas
permanently
and gave
blacks
property
rights
there.
Interest was
expressed in
rescinding
the law
against
interracial
marriage and
also
rescinding
the law
against sex
between the
races, which
was under
ridicule
abroad. The
spending for
black
schools
increased,
to
one-seventh
of white
children per
child, up
from on
one-sixteenth
in 1968. At
the same
time,
attention
was given to
strengthening
the
effectiveness
of the
police
apparatus.
In January
1985, Botha
addressed
the
government's
House of
Assembly and
stated that
the
government
was willing
to release
Mandela on
condition
that Mandela
pledge
opposition
to acts of
violence to
further
political
objectives.
Mandela's
reply was
read in
public by
his daughter
Zinzi
his
first words
distributed
publicly
since his
sentence to
prison
twenty-one
years
before.
Mandela
described
violence as
the
responsibility
of the
apartheid
regime and
said with
democracy
there would
be no need
for
violence.
The crowd
listening to
the reading
of his
speech
erupted in
cheers and
chants. This
response
helped to
further
elevate
Mandela's
status in
the eyes of
those, both
internationally
and
domestically,
who opposed
apartheid.
Between 1986
and 1988,
some petty
apartheid
laws were
repealed.
Botha told
white South
Africans to
"adapt or
die" and
twice he
wavered on
the eve of
what were
billed as "rubicon"
announcements
of
substantial
reforms,
although on
both
occasions he
backed away
from
substantial
changes.
Ironically,
these
reforms
served only
to trigger
intensified
political
violence
through the
remainder of
the eighties
as more
communities
and
political
groups
across the
country
joined the
resistance
movement.
Botha's
government
stopped
short of
substantial
reforms,
such as
lifting the
ban on the
ANC, PAC and
SACP and
other
liberation
Organizations,
releasing
political
prisoners,
or repealing
the
foundation
laws of
grand
apartheid.
The
government's
stance was
that they
would not
contemplate
negotiating
until those
Organizations
"renounced
violence".
By 1987 the
growth of
South
Africa's
economy had
dropped to
among the
lowest rate
in the
world, and
the ban on
South
African
participation
in
international
sporting
events was
frustrating
many whites
in South
Africa.
Examples of
African
states with
black
leaders and
white
minorities
existed in
Kenya and
Zimbabwe.
Whispers of
South Africa
one day
having a
black
President
sent more
hard line
whites into
Rightist
parties.
Mandela was
moved to a
four-bedroom
house of his
own, with a
swimming
pool and
shaded by
fir trees,
on a prison
farm just
outside Cape
Town. He had
an
unpublicized
meeting with
Botha, Botha
impressing
Mandela by
walking
forward,
extending
his hand and
pouring
Mandela's
tea. And the
two had a
friendly
discussion,
Mandela
comparing
the African
National
Conference's
rebellion
with that of
the
Afrikaner
rebellion,
and about
everyone
being
brothers.
A number of
clandestine
meetings
were held
between the
ANC-in-exile
and various
sectors of
the internal
struggle,
such as
women and
educationalists.
More
overtly, a
group of
white
intellectuals
met the ANC
in Senegal
for talks.
Presidency
of F.W. de
Klerk
Early in
1989, Botha
suffered a
stroke; he
was
prevailed
upon to
resign in
February
1989. He was
succeeded as
president
later that
year by F.W.
de Klerk.
Despite his
initial
reputation
as a
conservative,
De Klerk
moved
decisively
towards
negotiations
to end the
political
stalemate in
the country.
In his
opening
address to
parliament
on 2
February
1990, De
Klerk
announced he
would repeal
discriminatory
laws and
lift the
30-year ban
on leading
anti-apartheid
groups such
as the
African
National
Congress,
the Pan
Africanist
Congress,
the South
African
Communist
Party (SACP)
and the UDF.
The Land Act
was brought
to an end.
De Klerk
also made
his first
public
commitment
to release
jailed ANC
leader
Nelson
Mandela, to
return to
press
freedom and
to suspend
the death
penalty.
Media
restrictions
were lifted
and
political
prisoners
not guilty
of
common-law
crimes were
released.
On 11
February
1990, Nelson
Mandela was
released
from Victor
Verster
Prison after
more than 27
years in
prison.
Having been
instructed
by the UN
Security
Council to
end its
long-standing
involvement
in
South-West
Africa
/Namibia,
and in the
face of
military
stalemate in
Southern
Angola, and
an
escalation
in the size
and cost of
the combat
with the
Cubans, the
Angolans,
and SWAPO
forces and
the growing
cost of the
border war,
South Africa
negotiated a
change of
control of
this
territory;
Namibia
officially
became an
independent
state on 21
March 1990.
Negotiations
to end
apartheid in
South Africa
Apartheid
was
dismantled
in a series
of
negotiations
from 1990 to
1993,
culminating
in elections
in 1994, the
first in
South Africa
with
universal
suffrage.
From 1990 to
1996 the
legal
apparatus of
apartheid
was
abolished.
In 1990
negotiations
were
earnestly
begun, with
two meetings
between the
government
and the ANC.
The purpose
of the
negotiations
was to pave
the way for
talks
towards a
peaceful
transition
of power.
These
meetings
were
successful
in laying
down the
preconditions
for
negotiations
- despite
the
considerable
tensions
still
abounding
within the
country.
At the first
meeting, the
NP and ANC
discussed
the
conditions
for
negotiations
to begin.
The meeting
was held at
Groote
Schuur, the
President's
official
residence.
They
released the
Groote
Schuur
Minute which
said that
before
negotiations
commenced
political
prisoners
would be
freed and
all exiles
allowed to
return.
There were
fears that
the change
of power in
South Africa
would be
violent. To
avoid this,
it was
essential a
peaceful
resolution
between all
parties be
reached. In
December
1991, the
Convention
for a
Democratic
South Africa
(CODESA)
began
negotiations
on the
formation of
a
multiracial
transitional
government
and a new
constitution
extending
political
rights to
all groups.
CODESA
adopted a
Declaration
of Intent
and
committed
itself to an
"undivided
South
Africa".
Reforms and
negotiations
to end
apartheid
led to a
backlash
among the
right-wing
white
opposition,
leading to
the
Conservative
Party
winning a
number of
by-elections
against NP
candidates.
De Klerk
responded by
calling a
whites-only
referendum
in March
1992 to
decide
whether
negotiations
should
continue. A
68-percent
majority of
white voters
gave its
support, and
the victory
instilled in
De Klerk and
the
government a
lot more
confidence,
giving the
NP a
stronger
position in
negotiations.
Thus, when
negotiations
resumed in
May 1992,
under the
tag of
CODESA II,
stronger
demands were
made. The
ANC and the
government
could not
reach a
compromise
on how power
should be
shared
during the
transition
to
democracy.
The NP
wanted to
retain a
strong
position in
a
transitional
government,
as well as
the power to
change
decisions
made by
parliament.
Persistent
violence
added to the
tension
during the
negotiations.
This was due
mostly to
the intense
rivalry
between the
Inkatha
Freedom
Party (IFP)
and the ANC
and the
eruption of
some
traditional
tribal and
local
rivalrys
between the
Zulu and
Xhosa
historical
tribal
affinities,
especially
in the
Southern
Natal
provinces.
Although
Mandela and
Buthelezi
met to
settle their
differences,
they could
not stem the
violence.
One of the
worst cases
of ANC-IFP
violence was
the
Boipatong
massacre of
17 June
1992, when
200 IFP
militants
attacked the
Gauteng
township of
Boipatong,
killing 45.
Witnesses
said the men
had arrived
in police
vehicles,
supporting
claims that
elements
within the
police and
army
contributed
to the
ongoing
violence.
When De
Klerk tried
to visit the
scene of the
incident, he
was driven
away by
angry
crowds, on
whom the
police
opened fire,
killing
three.
Mandela
argued that
de Klerk, as
head of
state, was
responsible
for bringing
an end to
the
bloodshed.
He also
accused the
South
African
police of
inciting the
ANC-IFP
violence.
This formed
the basis
for ANC's
withdrawal
from the
negotiations,
and the
CODESA forum
broke down
completely
at this
stage.
The Bisho
massacre on
7 September
1992 brought
matters to a
head. The
Ciskei
Defence
Force killed
29 persons
and injured
200 when
they opened
fire on ANC
marchers
demanding
the
reincorporation
of the
Ciskei
homeland
into South
Africa. In
the
aftermath,
Mandela and
De Klerk
agreed to
meet to find
ways to end
the
spiraling
violence.
This led to
a resumption
of
negotiations.
Right-wing
violence
also added
to the
hostilities
of this
period. The
assassination
of Chris
Hani on 10
April 1993
threatened
to plunge
the country
into chaos.
Hani, the
popular
general
secretary of
the South
African
Communist
Party (SACP),
was
assassinated
in 1993 in
Dawn Park in
Johannesburg
by Janusz
Waluś, an
anti-communist
Polish
refugee who
had close
links to the
white
nationalist
Afrikaner
Weerstandsbeweging
(AWB). Hani
enjoyed
widespread
support
beyond his
constituency
in the SACP
and ANC and
had been
recognized
as a
potential
successor to
Mandela; his
death
brought
forth
protests
throughout
the country
and across
the
international
community,
but
ultimately
proved a
turning
point, after
which the
main parties
pushed for a
settlement
with
increased
determination.
On 25 June
1993, the
AWB used an
armored
vehicle to
crash
through the
doors of the
World Trade
Centre where
talks were
still going
ahead under
the
Negotiating
Council,
though this
did not
derail the
process.
In addition
to the
continuing
"black-on-black"
violence,
there were a
number of
attacks on
white
civilians by
the PAC's
military
wing, the
Azanian
Persons's
Liberation
Army (APLA).
The PAC was
hoping to
strengthen
their
standing by
attracting
the support
of the
angry,
impatient
youth. In
the St James
Church
massacre on
25 July
1993,
members of
the APLA
opened fire
in a church
in Cape
Town,
killing 11
members of
the
congregation
and wounding
58.
In 1993, de
Klerk and
Mandela were
jointly
awarded the
Nobel Peace
Prize "for
their work
for the
peaceful
termination
of the
apartheid
regime, and
for laying
the
foundations
for a new
democratic
South
Africa".
Violence
persisted
right up to
the 1994
elections.
Lucas
Mangope,
leader of
the
Bophuthatswana
homeland,
declared it
would not
take part in
the
elections.
It had been
decided,
once the
temporary
constitution
had come
into effect,
the
homelands
would be
incorporated
into South
Africa, but
Mangope did
not want
this to
happen.
There were
strong
protests
against his
decision,
leading to a
coup d'ιtat
in
Bophuthatswana
on 10 March
which
deposed
Mangope,
despite the
intervention
of white
right-wingers
hoping to
maintain him
in power.
Three AWB
militants
were killed
during this
intervention,
and
harrowing
images were
shown on
national
television
and in
newspapers
across the
world.
Two days
before the
elections, a
car bomb
exploded in
Johannesburg,
killing
nine. The
day before
the
elections,
another one
went off,
injuring
thirteen.
Finally,
though, at
midnight on
26, 27 April
1994, the
old flag was
lowered, and
the old (now
co-official)
national
anthem Die
Stem ("The
Call") was
sung,
followed by
the raising
of the new
rainbow flag
and singing
of the other
co-official
anthem,
Nkosi
Sikelel'
iAfrika
("God Bless
Africa").
South
African
general
election,
1994
The election
was held on
27 April
1994 and
went off
peacefully
throughout
the country
as
20,000,000
South
Africans
cast their
votes. There
was some
difficulty
in
organizing
the voting
in rural
areas, but,
throughout
the country,
persons
waited
patiently
for many
hours in
order to
vote amidst
a palpable
feeling of
goodwill. An
extra day
was added to
give
everyone the
chance.
International
observers
agreed that
the
elections
were free
and fair.
The ANC won
62.65% of
the vote,
less than
the 66.7%
that would
have allowed
it to
rewrite the
constitution.
In the new
parliament,
252 of its
400 seats
went to
members of
the African
National
Congress.
The NP
captured
most of the
white votes
and became
the official
opposition
party. As
well as
deciding the
national
government,
the election
decided the
provincial
governments,
and the ANC
won in seven
of the nine
provinces,
with the NP
winning in
the Western
Cape and the
IFP in
KwaZulu-Natal.
On 10 May
1994,
Mandela was
sworn in as
South
Africa's
president.
The
Government
of National
Unity was
established,
its cabinet
made up of
twelve ANC
representatives,
six from the
NP, and
three from
the IFP.
Thabo Mbeki
and Frederik
Willem de
Klerk were
made deputy
presidents.
The
anniversary
of the
elections,
27 April, is
celebrated
as a public
holiday in
South Africa
known as
Freedom Day.
ANC
strategy to
end
Apartheid
and
"persons'
war"
By 1974, the
ANC realized
that its
armed
struggle was
ineffective
against the
Apartheid
state. At
this time
they
suffered a
reduction in
finance from
Moscow and
felt an
increasing
danger of
being
surpassed by
the IFP and
the Black
Consciousness
movement in
South Africa
while the
ANC itself
was in
exile.
Therefore in
1978 the ANC
sent a
delegation
to Vietnam
to study the
tactics used
in their
persons
war. This
resulted in
a policy
change with
the adoption
of The Green
Book:
Lessons from
Vietnam.
This
strategy
adopted by
the ANC
entailed a
dual
approach,
the first
being to
increase
violent
military
activity
against the
general
public by
which the
Apartheid
government
could be
lured into
and accused
of
committing
brutalities
and
therefore
suffer loss
in prestige
and secondly
leveraging
the
political
struggle
with
propaganda
in order to
increase
sympathy
from the
international
community
and to
garner
support from
inside the
South
African
populace.
This would
put the
government
under
immense
pressure in
order to
force it to
make
concessions
during
negotiations
which would
normally not
be made.
The ANC
implemented
its persons
war on 3rd
September
1984 with a
surge of
violence in
Sebokeng and
other
townships in
the Vaal
area.
Streets were
barricaded
and
fortified
while
explosive
materials
and stones
were placed
near the
homes of
civilian
targets by
the ANC in
preparation
for the
days
unrest.
During this
unrest which
eventually
lasted a
month, 4
local
councillors
were killed
along with
60 other
persons.
5,500
persons were
killed in
political
violence by
the end of
1989 of whom
700 were put
to death by
the necklace
method by
ANC
activists.
The ANC was
unbanned by
FW de Klerk
in 1990, but
refused to
renounce
violence and
increased
its pressure
on the
government
to allow
its exiles
to return,
which mostly
compromised
13,000 armed
and trained
MK soldiers.
Violence
escalated
even though
the NP
Government
was fully
committed to
a peaceful
transition
as military
actions were
committed
against IFP
supporters
in August
and October
1992 during
the Patheni
and Folweni
massacres
where 28
persons
including a
Zulu Chief
who
supported
the IFP and
his family
were killed
and 33
injured.
Political
propaganda
was however
continuously
applied in
order to
create the
ruse that
the ANC was
only
pursuing
peaceful
negotiations.
An election
date was
forced
during the
negotiations
for 27 April
1994 and in
the four
months
leading to
the election
a further
spree of
violence
erupted in
which 1,500
persons were
killed in
political
violence.
The upsurge
of violence
that began
in February
1990 and
lasted until
the election
cost the
lives of
15,000
persons,
three times
the number
killed in
the first
five years
of the
persons
war. When
political
killings
reached this
climax, all
major
apartheid
laws (other
than the
constitution,
which had to
be
renegotiated)
had already
been
repealed.
The persons
war waged by
the ANC was
very
successful
in winning a
victory for
the ANC and
to establish
its overall
predominance
in South
African
politics
after
1994.[144]
Contrition
The
following
individuals,
who had
previously
supported
apartheid,
made public
apologies:
FW de Klerk
- "I
apologize in
my capacity
as leader of
the NP to
the millions
who suffered
wrenching
disruption
of forced
removals;
who suffered
the shame of
being
arrested for
pass law
offences;
who over the
decades
suffered the
indignities
and
humiliation
of racial
discrimination."
Marthinus
van
Schalkwyk
Adriaan Vlok
- who washed
the feet of
apartheid
victim Frank
Chikane.
Leon Wessels
- who said
"I am now
more
convinced
than ever
apartheid
was a
terrible
mistake that
blighted our
land. South
Africans did
not listen
to the
laughing and
the crying
of each
other. I am
sorry I had
been so hard
of hearing
for so
long."
South Africa's Afrikaners and
Arizona Republicans are one and the
same
("A mimetic polyalloy")
Arizona Republicans are the
reincarnation of the Afrikaners who
were the architects of racism as
evident by South Africa's Apartheid,
a system of legal racial segregation
enforced by the National Party
government in South Africa between
1948 and 1994, under which the
rights of the majority non-white
inhabitants of South Africa were
curtailed and minority rule by white
people was maintained.
Chronology of Arizona laws
directed to forcing Hispanic to
leave Arizona
1996: Legislature passes a law
requiring proof of citizenship to
get a driver's license. Russell
Pearce, director of the state Motor
Vehicle Division, wrote the law.
1997: Chandler police and federal
agents spend five days rounding up
suspected illegal immigrants in
downtown neighborhoods. They make
340 arrests, taking some legal
residents into custody. City
officials later pay $500,000 in
legal settlements and spend years
apologizing.
1998: Rep. Tom Smith, R-Phoenix,
proposes a bill to require ID be
shown at the polls. It fails in the
Senate. Another bill requiring proof
of citizenship to register to vote
doesn't get out of committee.
1999: Arizona ranchers ask
lawmakers to call on the National
Guard to come to the border to
suppress an "invasion." Effort goes
nowhere, beyond some lawmakers
reading a proclamation about border
violations.
2000: Voters endorse a requirement
for English immersion in schools,
banning bilingual education. It
passes 63 percent to 37 percent.
2001: Pearce begins first term as
state representative.
Moderate Republicans lose in GOP
primaries, giving Legislature a more
conservative tilt.
Voters approve Proposition 200,
which denies public benefits to
people not in the country legally.
Passes 56 percent to 44 percent.
2006: Pearce introduces a bill to
make it a state crime to be in the
country illegally and to allow peace
officers to question an individual's
immigration status. It also includes
measures to restrict employers from
hiring illegal immigrants. Gov.
Janet Napolitano vetoes the bill.
More than 100,000 march to the
state Capitol to support
comprehensive immigration reform on
the national level. Similar large
rallies are held in cities across
the U.S.
Voters endorse a trio of ballot
measures related to illegal
immigration, including requiring
out-of-state college tuition from
Arizona residents who can't prove
citizenship and denying bail to
illegal immigrants charged with a
crime. They also approve a measure
that makes English the state's
official language. All four ballot
measures pass with 70 percent-plus
of vote.
Legislature approves a bill that
levies fines against employers found
to have hired illegal immigrants.
The bill gets bipartisan support and
is signed by Napolitano.
2008: Maricopa County Sheriff Joe
Arpaio begins conducting immigration
sweeps.
Republicans gain ground in
legislative elections.
January 2010: Republican Jan
Brewer ascends to the Governor's
Office when Napolitano resigns to
join the Obama administration as
Homeland Security secretary.
January 2010: Pearce introduces
Senate Bill 1070.
February: SB 1070 passes Senate
17-13.
April 13: Amended version of SB
1070 passes House 35-21.
April 19: Senate gives final
approval to amended SB 1070 with
vote of 17-11.
April 23: Brewer signs SB 1070
into law.
April 29: Three separate lawsuits
challenging law's constitutionality
are filed in federal court.
April 30: Brewer signs into law SB
2650, which makes changes to SB
1070.
July 29: Arizona's new immigration
law scheduled to go into effect.
Racial segregation in South Africa
began in colonial times, but
apartheid as an official policy was
introduced following the general
election of 1948. New legislation
classified inhabitants into racial
groups "black" and "white," and
residential areas were segregated,
sometimes by means of forced
removals. From 1958, black people
were deprived of their citizenship.
The government segregated education,
medical care, and other public
services, and provided black people
with services inferior to those of
white people. (This is identical to
Arizona using tax credits to fund
charter schools where white children
attend rather than fund public
schools where Hispanic children
attend. Biggest support of racist
education program is Catholic
Diocese of Phoenix.)
Apartheid sparked significant
internal resistance and violence as
well as a long trade embargo against
South Africa. A series of popular
uprisings and protests were met with
the banning of opposition and
imprisoning of anti-apartheid
leaders. As unrest spread and became
more violent, state organizations
responded with increasing repression
and state-sponsored violence.
Reforms to apartheid in the 1980s
failed to quell the mounting
opposition, and in 1990 President
Frederik Willem de Klerk began
negotiations to end apartheid,
culminating in multi-racial
democratic elections in 1994, which
were won by the African National
Congress under Nelson Mandela. The
vestiges of apartheid still shape
South African politics and society.
The similarities of South Africa
apartheid and Arizona are starkly
profound and un-American.
In South Africa
apartheid,
Afrikaners were the only ones
eligible to vote and on voter
polling, nearly 100% of Afrikaners
approved of Apartheid policies.
In Arizona, news sources using
Rasmussen Reports daily
tracking
polls
to shows 65% of the nation's voters
strongly approve of Arizona SB 1070.
But the similarities of Afrikaners
or Arizonans
having a majority of voters strongly
approving enforcing Arizona SB 1070
does not make it right.
SB 1070s defects are likely
unfixable. It seeks attrition
through enforcement and to
discourage and deter unlawful entry
and presence of aliens.
Accordingly, its purpose is
essentially to induce
self-deportation, a federal
responsibility, and to override
decisions assigned by Congress to
federal agencies.
Last word
For a time, the racist anti-Hispanic
vitriolic sentiments toward Arizona
Hispanics and Hispanics living
throughout every town, city, state,
farm, countryside of the United
States will prevail but the words of
Mahatma Gandhi have never been more
timely, "There
have been tyrants, and murderers,
and for a time they can seem
invincible, but in the end they
always fall. Think of it
always.
The most profound statistic ever
published by the Unites States
Census Bureau: In 2097, 50% of the
entire US population will be
Hispanic.
Next best: In 2050,
30% of the entire US population will
be Hispanic.
All know
change is inevitable. Change is
constant. How we deal with change
becomes the test of our character.
God Bless America!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|