-

 

Nadal Wins Second Wimbledon

Hispanic Nadal Wins Second Wimbledon Title

 

WIMBLEDON, England (By Greg Bishop, NYT) July 4, 2010 — For the longest time, Rafael Nadal clung to his championship keepsake. He carried it, cradled it, even signed autographs with it tucked away in his right arm.

The Wimbledon trophy did what Nadal’s opponents could not over the fortnight. It made tears well in his eyes.

He captured the trophy at Centre Court on Sunday with an aggressive assault on Tomas Berdych, a lopsided match confirmed by the final tally, 6-3, 7-5, 6-4. Victory vaulted Nadal into rare company — his eighth major championship tied the likes of Andre Agassi, Jimmy Connors and Ivan Lendl — and he somersaulted across the grass in celebration.

“Last year was not an easy year for me,” he said. “To be back in the famous tournament of the world here, finish with the trophy, is amazing.”

For the first time since 2002, the Wimbledon men’s singles final did not feature Roger Federer. If that seemed strange, though, Nadal’s triumph certainly did not.

He slung groundstrokes, grunted and twisted his face into all the usual contortions. He looked normal, only he played different, more vicious, more aggressive, perhaps an improved version of the player who won this tournament in 2008.

Last year, Nadal watched Federer duel Andy Roddick from the sofa in his living room in Spain, breaking a string of three straight appearances in the Wimbledon final. On Sunday, in front a Centre Court crowd that included Bjorn Borg, Jaromir Jagr and the Rolling Stones guitarist Ronnie Wood, Nadal reclaimed both the trophy and his status as the best men’s player on the tour.

While it remains premature to debate if Nadal can match or exceed Federer’s 16 Grand Slam titles, it is fair to wonder where Nadal, only 24, will eventually fit in tennis history.

“His place is undecided,” said Darren Cahill, a former player and an analyst for ESPN. “So much of the story is yet to be written. Much of it depends on how his body holds up. That said, he better make room in his trophy case.”

Minutes before the match started, in the ESPN booth high above Centre Court, the commentators Dick Enberg and Patrick McEnroe said they believed the conditions favored Nadal against the big-serving, risk-taking Berdych, the challenger from the Czech Republic.

Not only had it rarely rained this tournament, drying out the grass and allowing for higher bounces, but wind shot through the All England Lawn Tennis Club earlier Sunday morning. That, too, worked better for Nadal, whose furious, spin-cycle groundstrokes leave a higher margin for error.

Over the past two weeks, Nadal showcased his increased versatility. Once content with a strategy of attrition, to stand far behind the baseline and grind down opponents with groundstrokes, he now often moved forward and attacked.

Against the sentimental favorite Andy Murray in the semifinals, Nadal approached the net 26 times and won 23 of those points. He also ran around his backhand, delivering toxic doses of topspin from the forehand side.

Early Sunday, Berdych went after Nadal’s backhand instead. But McEnroe said that Nadal had improved that shot, too, in recent months. He stood close to the baseline, cutting off the court, forcing Berdych to take chances, to play perfect.

Nadal broke Berdych at 4-3 and seized the first set with sharp serves and brutal backhands. That was important because Nadal now holds a 100-1 career record when winning the first set at a Grand Slam.

“Tactically, Nadal played a perfect set,” McEnroe said.

Berdych’s best opportunity came in the first game of the second set, when Nadal had six unforced errors, double his amount in the entire first set, and delivered uncharacteristic double faults. But Nadal held, and Berdych never again seriously threatened.

“He was really strong today,” Berdych said. “He’s showing in the last few months that he’s really the champion.”

Still, Berdych became the first Czech to advance to a Wimbledon final since Lendl in 1987. Along the way, he sent Federer on an early July vacation with a seismic four-set upset. Berdych followed that by dropping Novak Djokovic in the semifinals.

But Nadal proved over the past two weeks that, at least in this tournament, he played at a higher level than both Federer and Djokovic, who will be ranked third and second in the world when the rankings come out this week.

On the final point, Nadal hit another cross-court forehand, another long, looping stroke that Berdych could not handle. As he traditionally does here, Nadal fell backward onto the grass in celebration. He followed that with the nifty somersault, a new touch.

Nadal said afterward that he would withdraw from the Davis Cup to get treatment on his right knee back in Spain. Earlier in the tournament, he said tendinitis in the knee had bothered him, but on Sunday he said it did not hurt in any of his last four matches. He is unlikely to play until the Rogers Cup in Toronto in early August.

Nadal repeatedly talked during the tournament about how difficult last year was for him, with the knee injuries and the fall from the No. 1 ranking and the Wimbledon he missed. But since mid-April, he holds a 31-1 record, has regained the top ranking and claimed another Wimbledon trophy.

Everywhere Nadal went afterward, he carried that trophy, his new best friend. For as good as Nadal is on clay — and he is perhaps the best clay-court player in tennis history — he said that to win at Wimbledon, on grass, had always been his dream.

Now, for the second time, he held the championship keepsake as proof.  

.

 

 

 

•  Out of Many, One USA (coming later this year)

•  Hispanic News

•  Latino News

•  Jon Garrido News - National Headlines

•  Albuquerque News 

•  New Mexico News

•  Zorro News for Mexican American Democrats

•  Go Democrats

•  The Jon Garrido Network

•  Hispanic News Google Rank 1

•  Hispanic News Yahoo Rank 1

•  Hispanic News Bing Rank 1

•  Latin America News    

•  Mujer  Hispanic women monthly magazine

•  Latina  Business and Professional Women

•  Chica  Magazine for young Hispanic girls

•  Subete  Opportunities for Hispanics

•  Nueva Hispania

•  Kid Town  

•  Ultra Living   Ultra Living Hispanic Lifestyle

•  51 Plus Rank 1 Baby Boomer site by Google

•  Hispanic News 2005 Archive

•  Hispanic News 2006 Archive

•  Hispanic News 2007 Archive

•  Hispanic News 2008 Archive

•  Hispanic News 2010 Archive

•  Hispanic News 2010 Archive 

•  US Times 2005 Archive

•  US Times 2010 Archive








 

Rep. Luis Gutierrez

Why We Should Welcome McConnell's Demand for Hearings on Rescinding 14th Amendment

 

WASHINGTON (By Congressman Luis Gutierrez) August 5, 2010 — The "your papers, please" hysteria spreading through the Republican Party has reached a new low. Now, they want to corrupt the U.S. Constitution to promote their opposition to immigrants and immigration. Senior leaders in the House and Senate are introducing legislation and calling for hearings to explore whether we should change the U.S. Constitution to ensure that more people in the United States are denied citizenship or legal immigration status.

 

Specifically, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell joined an array of Republican lawmakers who feel we should examine whether to rescind all or part of the 14th amendment to the Constitution to prevent some children born in the U.S. from being granted U.S. citizenship.

 

The pro-life, pro-family Republicans are now pro-neonatal detention and deportation. It isn't enough to drive out the people not born here, now they want to drive out the ones that were.

Actually, I agree with Senator McConnell. We absolutely should hold hearings as soon as possible to discuss whether we should amend the U.S. Constitution to make newborns deportable. We need a high-level national discussion in both Houses of Congress on the issue of whether to station federal ICE agents in every maternity ward and delivery room right between the OB-GYN and the expectant father.

Imagine a United States where every birth initiates an investigation to determine the citizenship and immigration status of each parent. Let's have the hearing so we can take careful notes when the Republican's witness explains how this government intrusion into maternal and child health — burdening our health care system and discouraging pregnant women from seeking medical care (while perhaps discouraging claims of paternity) — is justified to secure our borders and protect the core liberties of America. I would love to hear the opening remarks of Judiciary Committee Members Lindsey Graham in the Senate or Lamar Smith in the House broadcast live from coast-to-coast on C-SPAN. I can hear it now. "Mr. Chairman, I would like to express my support for a full federal background check and proof of citizenship for every precious human life."

While we are at it, I think we should subpoena prominent Republicans like Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and former Senator Pete Domenici of New Mexico to explain how they have ruined our country with their automatic U.S. citizenship. Under at least some of the legislative proposals supported by the Republicans, neither one would be citizens because one or more of their parents were not permanent legal residents of the U.S. at the time of their birth. Let's get Olympic Gold Medalist Henry Cejudo and NASA Astronaut Jose "Astro Jose" Hernandez on the witness stand to defend all that they have robbed from the United States by usurping U.S. citizenship. At long last, the GOP has come up with the legislative strategy to guarantee that no man or woman can rise from humble origins, with a father who is legally present on a student visa, to sit in the Oval Office as President of the United States.

I really want to hear the Republican argument. Let's hear why the 14th amendment, which guarantees citizenship and equal protection under the law regardless of the race or nationality of your parents, is a law whose time has come and gone. Please explain to the American people how the 14th amendment that resolved the issue of African-American citizenship after emancipation and was the critical underpinning of the civil rights movement in the United States, ought to be cast off now because the parchment paper it is written on has grown yellow and curled. Just the expressions on the faces of my colleagues in the Congressional Black Caucus during such a hearing would make the whole exercise worth it to me.

The federal government won a preliminary injunction against Arizona's SB1070 immigration law on the grounds that the federal government's authority over immigration matters preempts the states from such intrusions. Well, in for a penny, in for a pound, I say. I think the Senate and the House ought to call immediate hearings as soon as we reconvene in September to put the Republican's immigration proposals up against Democratic ones and see which side is serious about rules, enforcement, legality and cracking down on employers.

 

Which side is for immigrants taking personal responsibility and getting right with the law and which side is just blowing smoke in an election year.

Madam Speaker, Mr. Majority Leader, and distinguished Chairmen and Chairwomen of the committees of jurisdiction, I rise to respectfully request that you call their bluff.

.

 

 

 
• Somos USA
• Hispanic News
• Latino News
• Jon Garrido News - National Headlines
• New Mexico News
• Albuquerque News
• Viva Nuevo Mιxico
• Via Garrido
• The Jon Garrido Network
• Hispanic News Google Rank 1
• Hispanic News Yahoo Rank 1
• Hispanic News Bing Rank 1
• Latin America News
• Mujer
• Latina
• Chica
• Subete
• Nueva Hispania
• Kid Town
• Ultra Living
• 51 Plus
• Hispanic News 2005 Archive
• Hispanic News 2006 Archive
• Hispanic News 2007 Archive
• Hispanic News 2008 Archive
• Hispanic News 2010 Archive
• Hispanic News 2010 Archive
• US Times 2005 Archive
• US Times 2010 Archive